From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9601FA21 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 02:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751450AbdJFCji (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:39:38 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54707 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751418AbdJFCjh (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:39:37 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEB4A7E40; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:39:37 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=sxhyoVt2Gc5DjbtEDtRQ4btjqMI=; b=gHSLin 8VC6iiAZYXbF7m1CSll7aPVbSasSvmNmFrpiRcEXmmK+dB9/vkCD7VqQc1g9X8rv BSuGsVWl9sjJoJpjTApD4BTceW4Qmqh3NhYnjtOFJNjuy3Xv3B/JqmfEA/sBcLEy nGlFWjoyF7PuAeCf+yYhrDbJFTosTXgJsm8Oo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wYa99GWUdrH34yffVAMacrgnCYnAPS2T rFnbkyczQ5Ft9WIY7SydKJuiiGF2ol/36pw2upRFlDP6CDpMQWsZurIXYsULJc8h Kr3bcuGD0BWoe29ytcr329v1aO5dMLgQqP/kIaFXVyNjDD99ttrDGSjr2/z3ryrZ XYMrkXOX+is= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AC4A7E3F; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:39:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EFB6A7E3E; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:39:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Alex Vandiver Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Reporting index properties References: Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 11:39:35 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Alex Vandiver's message of "Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:47:36 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 97E304C6-AA3F-11E7-8455-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Alex Vandiver writes: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > Do folks have feelings about surfacing this information, and where such >> > logic should live? >> >> Probably one of the t/helper/test-dump-*.c programs, if we already >> do not have one. > > The goal would be to be able to extract this information from > repositories, with a standard git install. That directory only > contains developer tools, which aren't part of the install, no? Yes, and I am saying that such logic should not live in standard install outside developer tools ;-)