From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] write_sha1_file_prepare: fix buffer overrun with extra-long object type
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 10:59:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzj5krzpe.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4mnsteb8.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 04 May 2015 10:58:35 -0700")
By the way, you would notice that "if we have returnsha1, then copy
that in" bit is not in the new literally codepath but still is in
write_sha1_file().
I do not think any caller passes a NULL as return_sha1 in today's
code, which made me curious.
It turns out to be a remnant of d6d3f9d0 (This implements the new
"recursive tree" write-tree., 2005-04-09); before that change,
write_sha1_file() did not have an ability to tell the caller what
object it wrote, and Linus made it optional for the callers when he
added the return_sha1[] out parameter, but all of its callers did
want the resulting object name.
So I think it is safe and sensible to do the following change
regardless of "hash-object --literally" fix.
sha1_file.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
index c8ab069..96e813f 100644
--- a/sha1_file.c
+++ b/sha1_file.c
@@ -3002,9 +3002,8 @@ static int freshen_packed_object(const unsigned char *sha1)
return find_pack_entry(sha1, &e) && freshen_file(e.p->pack_name);
}
-int write_sha1_file(const void *buf, unsigned long len, const char *type, unsigned char *returnsha1)
+int write_sha1_file(const void *buf, unsigned long len, const char *type, unsigned char *sha1)
{
- unsigned char sha1[20];
char hdr[32];
int hdrlen;
@@ -3012,8 +3011,6 @@ int write_sha1_file(const void *buf, unsigned long len, const char *type, unsign
* it out into .git/objects/??/?{38} file.
*/
write_sha1_file_prepare(buf, len, type, sha1, hdr, &hdrlen);
- if (returnsha1)
- hashcpy(returnsha1, sha1);
if (freshen_loose_object(sha1) || freshen_packed_object(sha1))
return 0;
return write_loose_object(sha1, hdr, hdrlen, buf, len, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 7:25 [PATCH 0/3] hash-object crash fix and new doc and tests Eric Sunshine
2015-05-04 7:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] git-hash-object.txt: document --literally option Eric Sunshine
2015-05-04 7:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] t1007: add hash-object --literally tests Eric Sunshine
2015-05-04 7:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] write_sha1_file_prepare: fix buffer overrun with extra-long object type Eric Sunshine
2015-05-04 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-04 17:59 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-05-04 21:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] "hash-object --literally" fixes Junio C Hamano
2015-05-04 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] git-hash-object.txt: document --literally option Junio C Hamano
2015-05-04 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] write_sha1_file_prepare: fix buffer overrun with extra-long object type Junio C Hamano
2015-05-05 0:13 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-05 0:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-05 17:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-05 18:49 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-04 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] t1007: add hash-object --literally tests Junio C Hamano
2015-05-04 21:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] write_sha1_file(): do not use a separate sha1[] array Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqzj5krzpe.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.