From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Lukas Fleischer <git@cryptocrack.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t5704: Fix the test that checks for excluded tags
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:08:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzjfkqap5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406968747-16100-1-git-send-email-git@cryptocrack.de> (Lukas Fleischer's message of "Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:39:06 +0200")
Lukas Fleischer <git@cryptocrack.de> writes:
> In c9a42c4 (bundle: allow rev-list options to exclude annotated tags,
> 2009-01-02), we added a test to check whether annotated tags, which fall
> outside the specified date range, are excluded from bundles. However,
> when initializing the repository, a command to create a lightweight tag
> was used. Fix this by replacing `git tag` by `git tag -a`. Furthermore,
> explicitly mention in the test message that an annotated tag is created
> and also test whether tags within the specified date range are included
> properly.
>
> Note that this fix reveals that the annotated tag exclusion actually
> does not work. Therefore, the test is marked expect-failure for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <git@cryptocrack.de>
> ---
> t/t5704-bundle.sh | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5704-bundle.sh b/t/t5704-bundle.sh
> index a45c316..2f063ea 100755
> --- a/t/t5704-bundle.sh
> +++ b/t/t5704-bundle.sh
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ test_description='some bundle related tests'
> test_expect_success 'setup' '
> test_commit initial &&
> test_tick &&
> - git tag -m tag tag &&
> + git tag -am tag tag &&
I'd prefer to see this spelled as "-a -m tag", but anyway,
this suggests to me that a request to create a light-weight tag
should be made to error out when -m is given, or automatically
promote itself to create an annotated tag, perhaps? That is in line
with what happens when you do "git tag -F <file> tagname".
Oh, wait.
$ git tag -d foo
$ git rev-parse refs/tags/foo --
fatal: bad revision 'refs/tags/foo'
$ git tag -m msg foo
$ git cat-file -t refs/tags/foo
tag
$ git cat-file tag refs/tags/foo
object d84843c...
type commit
tag foo
tagger Junio ....
msg
$ git version
git version 2.1.0-rc0-247-g66c8a75
The output from "git blame -L'/^int cmd_tag/,/^}/' builtin/tag.c"
seems to indicate that we automatically turned annotate on when a
message is given via -m or -F since the very first version of "git
tag" that was re-implemented in C, i.e. 62e09ce9 (Make git tag a
builtin., 2007-07-20).
Your analysis starts to sound fishy. What version of Git are you
talking about?
> test_commit second &&
> test_commit third &&
> git tag -d initial &&
> @@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
> git tag -d third
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'tags can be excluded by rev-list options' '
> +test_expect_failure 'annotated tags can be excluded by rev-list options' '
> + git bundle create bundle --all --since=7.Apr.2005.15:14:00.-0700 &&
> + git ls-remote bundle > output &&
> + grep tag output &&
> git bundle create bundle --all --since=7.Apr.2005.15:16:00.-0700 &&
> git ls-remote bundle > output &&
> ! grep tag output
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-04 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-02 8:39 [PATCH 1/2] t5704: Fix the test that checks for excluded tags Lukas Fleischer
2014-08-02 8:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] bundle: Fix exclusion of annotated tags Lukas Fleischer
2014-08-04 20:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-04 20:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-08-04 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] t5704: Fix the test that checks for excluded tags Junio C Hamano
2014-08-04 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] t5704: Complement annotated tag exclusion test Lukas Fleischer
2014-08-04 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] bundle: Fix exclusion of annotated tags Lukas Fleischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqzjfkqap5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@cryptocrack.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.