From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] remote-hg: more improvements Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 13:40:02 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1399169814-20201-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <536a83097302f_76ff7a52ec6c@nysa.notmuch> <536a999e2c0c_76ff7a52ec1e@nysa.notmuch> <536ad9601b73b_3caaa612ecdc@nysa.notmuch> <53712cd889ba9_2ea6e1f2f82f@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Philippe Vaucher , "git\@vger.kernel.org" To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 12 22:40:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjx1C-0000gX-Vn for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 22:40:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755596AbaELUkI (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 16:40:08 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:52236 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752241AbaELUkH (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 16:40:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D09515BF9; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:40:06 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=bfs9j2x2geWUGzm+rMhwzwKf054=; b=Q2/6sn uogMRHuw8OcQyU4cPykzFeJ8MhKo8cYS2ZvElekwsHh7vGMKGDfYF6g3+m/uDmlw 9/3TEjIK0zbxirh0vFbhUDIv4OZRJ5d1d2utYvbV8siCNmYT+KMeNg0oB1TaAI57 B5O93Xby66g3wdkqRap004573N24fLOrBfNB8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ELteM9s1yEo/heNEqXIgn5w4+XxekwTB m0ID34yfHKT9XH+kIrAitMV5MNcHNsVxl6aqYLyqz9cepCdGN9Ka2WyjgnU8xKZf hWzGCqYsoxQyEvkMxnZV3SHmWbTECVi57DnDM4iDs5D+gza6iF5X07yQTCHFmw61 1BBfG7JmmmI= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6119F15BF8; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0F6E15BF2; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:40:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <53712cd889ba9_2ea6e1f2f82f@nysa.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Mon, 12 May 2014 15:19:36 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 986835C2-DA15-11E3-87E2-9CEB01674E00-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... >> I was originally led to believe that its code quality was good >> enough, and that was why I merged the bottom three patches of the >> series even down to 'next' in the first place. But after seeing the >> "Of course" response that led to [*1*], which made me recall many >> patch-review interactions with him, I have started to have doubts. > > This is bullshit, and a wrong direction fallacy. > > Event #1: > Junio rejects the graduation > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248263 > > Event #2: > I give up improving remote helpers in git.git > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248063/focus=248341 > > Junio is trying to make you believe that his decision (#1) was caused by > something I did (#2). Don't fall into that trap, #2 happened *AFTER* #1, > it can't possibly be the cause. I think you misunderstood. I never said that I do not want it to graduate up (out is an option) based on code quality. In fact, I do not think anybody discussed about code quality until this morning. But because I was asked, I thought about it, and then answered honestly. I do not know what a trap you perceive is about, and I am not interested in your responses.