From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258963368BA for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 20:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785788494; cv=none; b=Np/7k9UBufPPDiCFsEJSp4FljTm3LMgRxsBAv0J/VMpSlSokyj79wD03Vlk5kQ6zhAZnF4pMX+nGsDT6BLodyTcG0bhx0fZfsd8A+mx1LuJd/jRSM8az1KastIo1rv5oCom65bWE2uamb+cWjRI932NZ9yJjLrkuUEcRom4lrbQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785788494; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QpzuKZJZSLBTc83Etlruw/4LQno0cPmo2pROx1Ow2hI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=l2rfIor5TvxHmoSBCd8/4oI2QFzSgwXt4Q2nae+EFE9tQmLt3BTG8s8rqP7SVEnFlxdhByM0GUU1G45+EQz3ltVu6YPgZxzo4/co+0jD4bEfGpW2Ag+IdYHn1+tjkAPhk1GNvRE5E6CPqdzjWjBSVe5D1RU3/JE/VqMxOF+TlzI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Bb3cyRoH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Bb3cyRoH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1785788492; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=wDYFRhO9DY0Bj7YAGeHSVpUAO2stcGCRigotROIXbb0=; b=Bb3cyRoHclzQaoVs/TLFoTJQDzQVI+jSs7WmYg/PI/d4FFP2OVHBaE6Bshz2/zX2BTjdGS ERf4q0DysdSdOjRwvouxqW9YtJFOBA8lypoDTcMunDKfh8IwWzsANDT8gzAhCaYs5hf7KK v1w7Lk6DzmsLyT9M/+4qbXjKAnr3o04= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-42-5Yr3i-k_NtyTvAJheNThZw-1; Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:21:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5Yr3i-k_NtyTvAJheNThZw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 5Yr3i-k_NtyTvAJheNThZw_1785788476 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E06D19560AB; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 20:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com (unknown [10.22.88.221]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C90A1800480; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 20:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 673JQN0v3318598; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:26:24 -0400 From: DJ Delorie To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] man/man5/tunables.conf: Document system-wide tunables config In-Reply-To: (message from Alejandro Colomar on Sat, 1 Aug 2026 03:13:01 +0200) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:26:23 -0400 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Alejandro Colomar writes: > '-' should be escaped: '\-' Fixed. > Also, these examples don't need bold. We use bold to differentiate from > program output, when we have examples that show both a command and its > output. In this case, being just a simple command, it's fine in roman. > > ld.so \-\-list\-tunables Fixed. > For consistency with patch 1/4, this should use the same wording: > > The syntax allows lines to start with the keyword > .B include > followed by a > .BR glob (7) > pattern. > > It's also much simpler. Fixed. I thought I got all of those in sync... >> +The file is parsed by >> +.BR \%ldconfig (8) >> +and the results stored in >> +.IR /etc/ld.so.cache . > > In patch 1/4 (ld.so.conf(5)), this paragraph is specified above the > specification of 'include'. We should be consistent. Do you prefer it > above in both, or below in both? I moved it here. > (I haven't pushed patch 1 yet, so if you want to modify it, I can amend > it.) Well, you did push it ;-) I added a signed-off-by to the new 2/4 but I've never had to do that due to Red Hat's blanket copyright assignments everywhere. Assuming those are in place for man-pages, I was under the impression that a signed-off-by would be contra-indicated.