From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754322Ab2DYOUa (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:20:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59400 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752073Ab2DYOU3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:20:29 -0400 To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa , Arun Sharma , Michael Rubin , David Sharp , Vaibhav Nagarnaik , Julia Lawall , Tom Zanussi Subject: Re: Our failure on tracing tools unification References: <1333666086-6517-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20120423144743.GB29985@somewhere> <1335193719.28150.171.camel@twins> <20120425080525.GA32613@gmail.com> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:19:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120425080525.GA32613@gmail.com> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:05:25 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mingo wrote: > [...] One thing that would suck is perf being bound by various > versions of this library floating out there. Could the event parser shared library be ABI-preserving? If so, what would perf have to fear? > [...] We had nothing but pain from external libraries so far [...] If the elfutils, newt, gtk, bfd, iberty, zlib, python libraries didn't contribute useful and un-rewriteable functionality, perf would not be using them. - FChE