From: Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: "Søren Sandmann Pedersen" <ssp@redhat.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack tracing routines
Date: 08 Nov 2010 12:38:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ye87hgorqoh.fsf@camel17.daimi.au.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101107212412.GB11134@nowhere>
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> writes:
> > (FWIW, this
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> > index 461a85d..d977d26 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> > @@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
> > .warning_symbol = backtrace_warning_symbol,
> > .stack = backtrace_stack,
> > .address = backtrace_address,
> > - .walk_stack = print_context_stack_bp,
> > + .walk_stack = print_context_stack,
> > };
> >
> > makes it produce correct kernel callchains. And yes, I did compile the
> > kernel with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER).
>
>
>
> What do you see is broken in 64 bits perf callchains? Can you please provide
> me more details so that I can fix the issue?
Apparently, the problem only happens when using the hrtimer based
events. I don't think there is a way to make perf use those from the
command line, but if you apply this:
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -294,6 +294,12 @@ static void create_counter(int counter, int cpu)
attr->enable_on_exec = 1;
}
+ if (attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES && attr->type ==
PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
+ {
+ attr->type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
+ attr->config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
+ }
+
for (thread_index = 0; thread_index < thread_num; thread_index++) {
try_again:
fd[nr_cpu][counter][thread_index] = sys_perf_event_open(attr,
you should be able to see the problem. You can also try sysprof; it
always uses the software counters.
Soren
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ye8vdi7mluz.fsf@camel16.daimi.au.dk>
2009-10-22 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/2 -tip] perf: Don't generate events for the idle task when exclude_idle is set Soeren Sandmann
2009-10-22 16:38 ` [PATCH] x86: Get bp from the IRQ regs instead of directly from the CPU Soeren Sandmann
2009-10-23 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-29 12:46 ` Soeren Sandmann
2010-11-05 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/1] x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack tracing routines Søren Sandmann Pedersen
2010-11-07 21:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-08 11:38 ` Soeren Sandmann [this message]
2010-11-18 15:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-05 11:14 ` [PATCH] " Søren Sandmann Pedersen
2009-10-23 7:35 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf: Keep track of remaining time when enabling/disabling swevent hrtimers Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ye87hgorqoh.fsf@camel17.daimi.au.dk \
--to=sandmann@daimi.au.dk \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ssp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.