From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F03C433EF for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C4360E8B for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229826AbhJ2RCE (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 13:02:04 -0400 Received: from mail-bn7nam10on2049.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.92.49]:1175 "EHLO NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229732AbhJ2RCE (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 13:02:04 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MGPokIj/3INjnTGOOKNH7QVsXSdR6GBiS8kU/f7aypPWJyUCNjWzebE07R31lO3Heu1kyCbIPx9+S1VV4+nb4eqhnvdiKHmsTbHJkUEb+gp472/rlLPI3czaJT3tUS9GcoUS+vP7eiRiL7kn7sDpsQlXPcBNyQC5UJk00HAJsOdyS64D8YwAYj1u6h/Gd8pGfgknq6sRqfgv1Vjp1TAyFzuzbF9x5hVNjmmfAF0cLbtCAOhFiEb2ZH6FQLNCbM5Nq8IlE3es2rJPv2s30QqNpqry7lSDcOL3DSpSfWxuoH1bDnb8v7FVkRHJXMAN19bZvX8MHcJCU7vMoi9lwGMAvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=3DOHMptEEw+GkMJqT9by/eJoD7+5lspBZ8pbMGOA8bg=; b=d3JP81XVlkgQOwXFYUiwAW/QX80tayFWAWWNELJFrfGYnPCG1IBzCUhcd1kIJk5yojAKeT7jKxCZ9gUTnHW0gCf/aQ5xnqX0+32usWYxmGRq7IGK4zgMJj8Ve13Ylo7Z4jMrTw4pMcjEFFMIMY1pWmUq+vn1eIb4hmvt0KJfIY11qGJeC/BjH6oUbVbO9N0cQeHsebFfwOzpc6P3CbGZmcQTZ8UN8GmxGbnRTrphhgm90yUzkuQl1ZpW+0SnSzn0bXM1kYXTjU495ATj35fg0cxNNq56w/mRdejOl+JHO0AKu22X1W64UowThg+8pHP1Tso31bxu6IpfNkpnhg9hkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.112.34) smtp.rcpttodomain=mojatatu.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3DOHMptEEw+GkMJqT9by/eJoD7+5lspBZ8pbMGOA8bg=; b=say1HbdmTL8jDtjuUsVPQV3HeffS8cbFGbG2u1QyXz7uEGrziLBoc+GJrGCHjlU6oqdDovSrRURR++oqlEhAEN8NPiXDRL6Fr20lcELojG35BWtfFioPey0DVAldh6f4/6L6x5RnKbHRq01FcD41NETaTDkRCQ9RFGqObV5MaHo50m7lNVwBT+sY9EsdSzs2SFRnIdg9KHcOrPMaWPZI0dWfXhotzIncHvbIJVlg0jEZ3Q03QCtg9JYv1BUswxRbBiPNZE7n/dnyitnZP+NMbwnqBiV0sCJlRAyvfSeMVVGUP94ruVuXWV20dzQHPEA75csmu1ap/AfKEnarjcxeSQ== Received: from MW4PR03CA0048.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8e::23) by MWHPR1201MB0237.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:56::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4628.20; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:30 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT003.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8e:cafe::c7) by MW4PR03CA0048.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:8e::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4649.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:30 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.112.34) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; mojatatu.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mojatatu.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.112.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.112.34; helo=mail.nvidia.com; Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.112.34) by CO1NAM11FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.4649.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:30 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain.nvidia.com (172.20.187.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:08 +0000 References: <20211028110646.13791-1-simon.horman@corigine.com> <20211028110646.13791-4-simon.horman@corigine.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.2 From: Vlad Buslov To: Simon Horman CC: , Jamal Hadi Salim , Roi Dayan , Ido Schimmel , Cong Wang , Jiri Pirko , Baowen Zheng , Louis Peens , , Baowen Zheng Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH net-next v3 3/8] flow_offload: allow user to offload tc action to net device In-Reply-To: <20211028110646.13791-4-simon.horman@corigine.com> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:59:06 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [172.20.187.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 29fa417c-ceda-444a-c254-08d99afd7998 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MWHPR1201MB0237: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:1051; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: XLkgZzAzFlCQ8rfeCLDlggyfkiFnxQiRMvDmtiZSvEMnUtQFjAZlIunhXkdlqH3edM3b31H0LXmjuBz255G/lGazVFpdRT2CnTZlSnUk0JJlC7Nt7yGVbjIpBLjDvZ4/9QcWH9XJR+FKc2a/20G64bH+iQgAybPvDqxtwWg320awBwLUO/zMHlPkzLkVLmsliIDD8bhxIsFBdWY761GtYqF5jJlcGIgBc8dHv7e7koL02eN6oPp7iKo4SImGrGBUdZwpEZGA4YrQlF/N74Pvj7swTwSY1mkklVe5QAxqjGJa0JIA6rSAOUrn+Fbko1WAsxizh15nzuP1fI+wnFwPaVjWv+W3qwwrWbxAMtGh7Y6YxA9I6Z3ue8BqqKu3HJ8S3MQaKoriwej9OSmCXHhRigH82jnnLTJPHi8AgwhtZo9aZj7bgmaCFSF8b8B0/42Q6ANGAjEzT7sosWlc9/l9CvGRuxTyRN/ZBtuWPZT05mzwgF2Ymxz2TYmrSvdyDxXHcs40h90zz5NvgWK10IEHvuGrVstfY9aeQ5FUqBfdSbPa2+IVy4uqjG1nAqEIwgepcNWdKbt6FCwuPs3NOcuvnwEyRSG10MsccjZvAjNp9lssxXfBCECesls3Q5xbCBg447hrqCkZwjj10VPq+AYN8pc9zEjYe0rTHxJCP5iWh4crH4gX3ENVTKbDqcrjRVYRZj1LZP24bwVjB35uOIjIRg== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.112.34;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:schybrid03.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(4636009)(46966006)(36840700001)(426003)(36906005)(2906002)(186003)(54906003)(508600001)(83380400001)(7636003)(336012)(7696005)(2616005)(356005)(8676002)(8936002)(47076005)(5660300002)(30864003)(70586007)(36756003)(16526019)(70206006)(316002)(26005)(36860700001)(4326008)(86362001)(6916009)(82310400003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2021 16:59:30.5504 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 29fa417c-ceda-444a-c254-08d99afd7998 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.112.34];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT003.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR1201MB0237 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu 28 Oct 2021 at 14:06, Simon Horman wrote: > From: Baowen Zheng > > Use flow_indr_dev_register/flow_indr_dev_setup_offload to > offload tc action. > > We need to call tc_cleanup_flow_action to clean up tc action entry since > in tc_setup_action, some actions may hold dev refcnt, especially the mirror > action. > > Signed-off-by: Baowen Zheng > Signed-off-by: Louis Peens > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > --- > include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 + > include/net/act_api.h | 2 +- > include/net/flow_offload.h | 17 ++++ > include/net/pkt_cls.h | 15 ++++ > net/core/flow_offload.c | 43 ++++++++-- > net/sched/act_api.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > net/sched/cls_api.c | 29 ++++++- > 7 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h > index 3ec42495a43a..9815c3a058e9 100644 > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -916,6 +916,7 @@ enum tc_setup_type { > TC_SETUP_QDISC_TBF, > TC_SETUP_QDISC_FIFO, > TC_SETUP_QDISC_HTB, > + TC_SETUP_ACT, > }; > > /* These structures hold the attributes of bpf state that are being passed > diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h > index b5b624c7e488..9eb19188603c 100644 > --- a/include/net/act_api.h > +++ b/include/net/act_api.h > @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static inline void tcf_action_inc_overlimit_qstats(struct tc_action *a) > void tcf_action_update_stats(struct tc_action *a, u64 bytes, u64 packets, > u64 drops, bool hw); > int tcf_action_copy_stats(struct sk_buff *, struct tc_action *, int); > - > +int tcf_action_offload_del(struct tc_action *action); This doesn't seem to be used anywhere outside of act_api in this series, so why is it exported? > int tcf_action_check_ctrlact(int action, struct tcf_proto *tp, > struct tcf_chain **handle, > struct netlink_ext_ack *newchain); > diff --git a/include/net/flow_offload.h b/include/net/flow_offload.h > index 3961461d9c8b..aa28592fccc0 100644 > --- a/include/net/flow_offload.h > +++ b/include/net/flow_offload.h > @@ -552,6 +552,23 @@ struct flow_cls_offload { > u32 classid; > }; > > +enum flow_act_command { > + FLOW_ACT_REPLACE, > + FLOW_ACT_DESTROY, > + FLOW_ACT_STATS, > +}; > + > +struct flow_offload_action { > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack; /* NULL in FLOW_ACT_STATS process*/ > + enum flow_act_command command; > + enum flow_action_id id; > + u32 index; > + struct flow_stats stats; > + struct flow_action action; > +}; > + > +struct flow_offload_action *flow_action_alloc(unsigned int num_actions); > + > static inline struct flow_rule * > flow_cls_offload_flow_rule(struct flow_cls_offload *flow_cmd) > { > diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h > index 193f88ebf629..922775407257 100644 > --- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h > +++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h > @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static inline void tcf_exts_put_net(struct tcf_exts *exts) > for (; 0; (void)(i), (void)(a), (void)(exts)) > #endif > > +#define tcf_act_for_each_action(i, a, actions) \ > + for (i = 0; i < TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO && ((a) = actions[i]); i++) > + > static inline void > tcf_exts_stats_update(const struct tcf_exts *exts, > u64 bytes, u64 packets, u64 drops, u64 lastuse, > @@ -532,8 +535,19 @@ tcf_match_indev(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex) > return ifindex == skb->skb_iif; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT > int tc_setup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > const struct tcf_exts *exts); Why does existing cls_api function tc_setup_flow_action() now depend on CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT? > +#else > +static inline int tc_setup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > + const struct tcf_exts *exts) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > +#endif > + > +int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > + struct tc_action *actions[]); > void tc_cleanup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action); > > int tc_setup_cb_call(struct tcf_block *block, enum tc_setup_type type, > @@ -554,6 +568,7 @@ int tc_setup_cb_reoffload(struct tcf_block *block, struct tcf_proto *tp, > enum tc_setup_type type, void *type_data, > void *cb_priv, u32 *flags, unsigned int *in_hw_count); > unsigned int tcf_exts_num_actions(struct tcf_exts *exts); > +unsigned int tcf_act_num_actions_single(struct tc_action *act); > > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT > int tcf_qevent_init(struct tcf_qevent *qe, struct Qdisc *sch, > diff --git a/net/core/flow_offload.c b/net/core/flow_offload.c > index 6beaea13564a..6676431733ef 100644 > --- a/net/core/flow_offload.c > +++ b/net/core/flow_offload.c > @@ -27,6 +27,27 @@ struct flow_rule *flow_rule_alloc(unsigned int num_actions) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_rule_alloc); > > +struct flow_offload_action *flow_action_alloc(unsigned int num_actions) > +{ > + struct flow_offload_action *fl_action; > + int i; > + > + fl_action = kzalloc(struct_size(fl_action, action.entries, num_actions), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!fl_action) > + return NULL; > + > + fl_action->action.num_entries = num_actions; > + /* Pre-fill each action hw_stats with DONT_CARE. > + * Caller can override this if it wants stats for a given action. > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < num_actions; i++) > + fl_action->action.entries[i].hw_stats = FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DONT_CARE; > + > + return fl_action; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_action_alloc); > + > #define FLOW_DISSECTOR_MATCH(__rule, __type, __out) \ > const struct flow_match *__m = &(__rule)->match; \ > struct flow_dissector *__d = (__m)->dissector; \ > @@ -549,19 +570,25 @@ int flow_indr_dev_setup_offload(struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *sch, > void (*cleanup)(struct flow_block_cb *block_cb)) > { > struct flow_indr_dev *this; > + u32 count = 0; > + int err; > > mutex_lock(&flow_indr_block_lock); > + if (bo) { > + if (bo->command == FLOW_BLOCK_BIND) > + indir_dev_add(data, dev, sch, type, cleanup, bo); > + else if (bo->command == FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND) > + indir_dev_remove(data); > + } > > - if (bo->command == FLOW_BLOCK_BIND) > - indir_dev_add(data, dev, sch, type, cleanup, bo); > - else if (bo->command == FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND) > - indir_dev_remove(data); > - > - list_for_each_entry(this, &flow_block_indr_dev_list, list) > - this->cb(dev, sch, this->cb_priv, type, bo, data, cleanup); > + list_for_each_entry(this, &flow_block_indr_dev_list, list) { > + err = this->cb(dev, sch, this->cb_priv, type, bo, data, cleanup); > + if (!err) > + count++; > + } > > mutex_unlock(&flow_indr_block_lock); > > - return list_empty(&bo->cb_list) ? -EOPNOTSUPP : 0; > + return (bo && list_empty(&bo->cb_list)) ? -EOPNOTSUPP : count; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_indr_dev_setup_offload); > diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c > index 3258da3d5bed..33f2ff885b4b 100644 > --- a/net/sched/act_api.c > +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c > @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > > #ifdef CONFIG_INET > DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(tcf_frag_xmit_count); > @@ -148,6 +161,7 @@ static int __tcf_action_put(struct tc_action *p, bool bind) > idr_remove(&idrinfo->action_idr, p->tcfa_index); > mutex_unlock(&idrinfo->lock); > > + tcf_action_offload_del(p); > tcf_action_cleanup(p); > return 1; > } > @@ -341,6 +355,7 @@ static int tcf_idr_release_unsafe(struct tc_action *p) > return -EPERM; > > if (refcount_dec_and_test(&p->tcfa_refcnt)) { > + tcf_action_offload_del(p); > idr_remove(&p->idrinfo->action_idr, p->tcfa_index); > tcf_action_cleanup(p); > return ACT_P_DELETED; > @@ -452,6 +467,7 @@ static int tcf_idr_delete_index(struct tcf_idrinfo *idrinfo, u32 index) > p->tcfa_index)); > mutex_unlock(&idrinfo->lock); > > + tcf_action_offload_del(p); tcf_action_offload_del() and tcf_action_cleanup() seem to be always called together. Consider moving the call to tcf_action_offload_del() into tcf_action_cleanup(). > tcf_action_cleanup(p); > module_put(owner); > return 0; > @@ -1061,6 +1077,154 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, > return ERR_PTR(err); > } > > +static int flow_action_init(struct flow_offload_action *fl_action, > + struct tc_action *act, > + enum flow_act_command cmd, > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) > +{ > + if (!fl_action) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + fl_action->extack = extack; > + fl_action->command = cmd; > + fl_action->index = act->tcfa_index; > + > + if (is_tcf_gact_ok(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_ACCEPT; > + } else if (is_tcf_gact_shot(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_DROP; > + } else if (is_tcf_gact_trap(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_TRAP; > + } else if (is_tcf_gact_goto_chain(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_GOTO; > + } else if (is_tcf_mirred_egress_redirect(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_REDIRECT; > + } else if (is_tcf_mirred_egress_mirror(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED; > + } else if (is_tcf_mirred_ingress_redirect(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_REDIRECT_INGRESS; > + } else if (is_tcf_mirred_ingress_mirror(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED_INGRESS; > + } else if (is_tcf_vlan(act)) { > + switch (tcf_vlan_action(act)) { > + case TCA_VLAN_ACT_PUSH: > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH; > + break; > + case TCA_VLAN_ACT_POP: > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_POP; > + break; > + case TCA_VLAN_ACT_MODIFY: > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_MANGLE; > + break; > + default: > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + } else if (is_tcf_tunnel_set(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_TUNNEL_ENCAP; > + } else if (is_tcf_tunnel_release(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_TUNNEL_DECAP; > + } else if (is_tcf_csum(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_CSUM; > + } else if (is_tcf_skbedit_mark(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_MARK; > + } else if (is_tcf_sample(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_SAMPLE; > + } else if (is_tcf_police(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_POLICE; > + } else if (is_tcf_ct(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_CT; > + } else if (is_tcf_mpls(act)) { > + switch (tcf_mpls_action(act)) { > + case TCA_MPLS_ACT_PUSH: > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_MPLS_PUSH; > + break; > + case TCA_MPLS_ACT_POP: > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_MPLS_POP; > + break; > + case TCA_MPLS_ACT_MODIFY: > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_MPLS_MANGLE; > + break; > + default: > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + } else if (is_tcf_skbedit_ptype(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_PTYPE; > + } else if (is_tcf_skbedit_priority(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_PRIORITY; > + } else if (is_tcf_gate(act)) { > + fl_action->id = FLOW_ACTION_GATE; > + } else { > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int tcf_action_offload_cmd(struct flow_offload_action *fl_act, > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) > +{ > + int err; > + > + if (IS_ERR(fl_act)) > + return PTR_ERR(fl_act); > + > + err = flow_indr_dev_setup_offload(NULL, NULL, TC_SETUP_ACT, > + fl_act, NULL, NULL); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* offload the tc command after inserted */ > +static int tcf_action_offload_add(struct tc_action *action, > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) > +{ > + struct tc_action *actions[TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO] = { > + [0] = action, > + }; > + struct flow_offload_action *fl_action; > + int err = 0; > + > + fl_action = flow_action_alloc(tcf_act_num_actions_single(action)); > + if (!fl_action) > + return -EINVAL; Failed alloc-like functions usually result -ENOMEM. > + > + err = flow_action_init(fl_action, action, FLOW_ACT_REPLACE, extack); > + if (err) > + goto fl_err; > + > + err = tc_setup_action(&fl_action->action, actions); > + if (err) { > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, > + "Failed to setup tc actions for offload\n"); > + goto fl_err; > + } > + > + err = tcf_action_offload_cmd(fl_action, extack); > + tc_cleanup_flow_action(&fl_action->action); > + > +fl_err: > + kfree(fl_action); > + > + return err; > +} > + > +int tcf_action_offload_del(struct tc_action *action) > +{ > + struct flow_offload_action fl_act; > + int err = 0; > + > + if (!action) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + err = flow_action_init(&fl_act, action, FLOW_ACT_DESTROY, NULL); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + return tcf_action_offload_cmd(&fl_act, NULL); > +} > + > /* Returns numbers of initialized actions or negative error. */ > > int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, struct nlattr *nla, > @@ -1103,6 +1267,8 @@ int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, struct nlattr *nla, > sz += tcf_action_fill_size(act); > /* Start from index 0 */ > actions[i - 1] = act; > + if (!(flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_BIND)) > + tcf_action_offload_add(act, extack); > } > > /* We have to commit them all together, because if any error happened in > diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c > index 2ef8f5a6205a..351d93988b8b 100644 > --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c > +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c > @@ -3544,8 +3544,8 @@ static enum flow_action_hw_stats tc_act_hw_stats(u8 hw_stats) > return hw_stats; > } > > -int tc_setup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > - const struct tcf_exts *exts) > +int tc_setup_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > + struct tc_action *actions[]) > { > struct tc_action *act; > int i, j, k, err = 0; > @@ -3554,11 +3554,11 @@ int tc_setup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > BUILD_BUG_ON(TCA_ACT_HW_STATS_IMMEDIATE != FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_IMMEDIATE); > BUILD_BUG_ON(TCA_ACT_HW_STATS_DELAYED != FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DELAYED); > > - if (!exts) > + if (!actions) > return 0; > > j = 0; > - tcf_exts_for_each_action(i, act, exts) { > + tcf_act_for_each_action(i, act, actions) { > struct flow_action_entry *entry; > > entry = &flow_action->entries[j]; > @@ -3725,7 +3725,19 @@ int tc_setup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > spin_unlock_bh(&act->tcfa_lock); > goto err_out; > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tc_setup_action); > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT Maybe just move tc_setup_action() to act_api and ifdef its definition in pkt_cls.h instead of existing tc_setup_flow_action()? > +int tc_setup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action, > + const struct tcf_exts *exts) > +{ > + if (!exts) > + return 0; > + > + return tc_setup_action(flow_action, exts->actions); > +} > EXPORT_SYMBOL(tc_setup_flow_action); > +#endif > > unsigned int tcf_exts_num_actions(struct tcf_exts *exts) > { > @@ -3743,6 +3755,15 @@ unsigned int tcf_exts_num_actions(struct tcf_exts *exts) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_exts_num_actions); > > +unsigned int tcf_act_num_actions_single(struct tc_action *act) > +{ > + if (is_tcf_pedit(act)) > + return tcf_pedit_nkeys(act); > + else > + return 1; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_act_num_actions_single); > + > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT > static int tcf_qevent_parse_block_index(struct nlattr *block_index_attr, > u32 *p_block_index,