All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com>
To: Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>
Cc: Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts
Date: 22 Jan 2004 08:24:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq0hdyo15gt.fsf@wildopensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1074731162.25704.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>

>>>>> "Zan" == Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org> writes:

Zan> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 16:40, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:44:37 +0000, Mike Fedyk wrote: > What do you
>> think about individual email (non-list) using a confirmation >
>> based spam blocking system.
>> 
>> for personal email it is plain asocial. it tells me that a person
>> does not want to receive mail from me.

Zan> For me, that isn't what it says at all.  It tells me that he or
Zan> she is tired of receiving and sorting all of the spam every day.
Zan> Since I feel exactly the same way about spam, I cooperate and
Zan> reply with a confirmation.

I've had people pull the authentication game on me before. I just
stopped replying to them, waste of my time.

Fixing the spam problem is a lot easier without losing contact with
all your friends in the proces:, train your Bayesian filters and be
done with it. Mine were a mess, deleted all the data and fed 10 days
of spam and some proper mail through sa-learn. Since then I have seen
1 spam make it through during the last week, it used to be 20-40/day
(and some 200-300/day caught by the filters).

Jes

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-22 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ecartis-01212004203954.14209.1@mail.convergence2.de>
2004-01-21 19:43 ` List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts Dave Jones
2004-01-21 19:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-21 19:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-21 19:56     ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 20:12       ` John Bradford
2004-01-21 21:44       ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-22  5:11         ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-21 20:38     ` Zan Lynx
2004-01-21 20:57       ` Charles Cazabon
2004-01-21 21:57         ` Diego Calleja
2004-01-21 21:15       ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 21:29         ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-21 21:30         ` [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: " Mike Fedyk
2004-01-21 22:50           ` Adrian Bunk
2004-01-21 23:01           ` Wakko Warner
2004-01-22  6:51             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-01-22 14:31               ` Wakko Warner
2004-01-21 23:40           ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22  0:26             ` Zan Lynx
2004-01-22  5:14               ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-22 13:24               ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2004-01-22 16:56                 ` David Ford
2004-01-22 17:01                   ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-22 17:10                     ` David Ford
2004-01-22 17:35                       ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-22 18:18                       ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22 17:11                   ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22 17:30                   ` viro
2004-01-22 17:34                     ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2004-01-22 17:41                     ` David Ford
2004-01-22 18:20                       ` Brian Beattie
2004-01-23  7:41                         ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-23  9:24                         ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-22 18:35                   ` David Lang
2004-01-22 18:49                     ` David Ford
2004-01-22 22:18                       ` jw schultz
2004-01-22 22:58                         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-22 23:16                           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-23  6:49                           ` David S. Miller
2004-01-23 15:38                             ` Chris Ricker
2004-01-23  9:25                           ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-23 19:38                           ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-22 22:43                     ` Scott Laird
2004-01-24 20:14                     ` Kevin O'Connor
2004-01-24 21:12                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-24 23:25                         ` Kevin O'Connor
     [not found]                       ` <1hDmg-4AP-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-24 23:59                         ` Russ Allbery
2004-01-22 22:15                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2004-01-23  8:43                   ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-26 22:58                     ` Max Valdez
2004-01-23  9:17                   ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-22  5:13           ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-21 23:08         ` Russell King
2004-01-22 13:28           ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-21 22:13       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-21 23:01         ` Marcus Metzler
2004-01-22 14:14           ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-01-22 15:14             ` Marcus Metzler
2004-01-22 15:31               ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-01-21 23:21         ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-22 15:15     ` Michael Hunold
2004-01-22 15:18       ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 20:08   ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq0hdyo15gt.fsf@wildopensource.com \
    --to=jes@wildopensource.com \
    --cc=aj@dungeon.inka.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlynx@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.