From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AD7C43387 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5E721871 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="kpIjhmih" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726893AbeLSEXu (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:23:50 -0500 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:57952 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726595AbeLSEXu (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:23:50 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBJ4K7CA026657; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:23:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=oDGDo93zk5BAsAjKF7gp1AKAnNmZrQs2CtDnc9jJHio=; b=kpIjhmihK5ZcdZwgMaToX81PmomovitwhKb0aEBDlYXWub3yev2TkWvEwlMFg3O9yk1h yxZUfwFHoTsignuooD1yHYcX2Mu5b1gt5bXaUVmQ0/1gZ2o+9CZh7kMJaTRD70haACVG YTGtJcGKfnckadyNI/fzTCT5rY4zJRuQPDM7bGTI3G/2O9DlB/HLd9es+kh1KSbAe4Xr 9hBhiXFvcFyssl7zeHmVF9Um9oAAzMpyaQa1MBjUIUoJbXWBqzkgVGtx1LwlS3Zo7THD C1S6B/i86oB6aovrSAZGk8NJ/RWdU1kOli9e0wdNtAOmY7RS4BVMfksznaoHQlt5SWhS cQ== Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2pct8qxxqx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:23:38 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBJ4NbtZ000629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:23:38 GMT Received: from abhmp0008.oracle.com (abhmp0008.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBJ4NaTo008454; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:23:36 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:23:36 -0800 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Jens Axboe , Ming Lei , Hannes Reinecke , Paul Mackerras , Juergen Gross , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: remove the "clustering" flag V2 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <20181213151710.30036-1-hch@lst.de> <20181218070826.GA1787@lst.de> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:23:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20181218070826.GA1787@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:08:26 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9111 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=581 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812190035 Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Christoph, > can we get this reviewed and merge before the end of the merge window? > That gets the clustering put of the way for the multipage-biovec work > from Ming which we want to land in the block tree early in the next > merge window. I have been somewhat hesitant to apply this just before the merge window. However, I did go through it fairly carefully and since it's a mostly mechanical change, I did apply it. There were a few things I needed to tweak by hand and patch 9 forgot to update myrs and myrb. I left patch 10 for Jens to merge later (unless he acks it for me to pull in). -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering