From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfc: replace 'rp_mutex' with 'rp_lock' Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 21:48:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1461571293-953-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <57322963.7040507@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:48145 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076AbcEKBs4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2016 21:48:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <57322963.7040507@sandisk.com> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Tue, 10 May 2016 11:33:07 -0700") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Hannes Reinecke , "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , Ewan Milne , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Bart" == Bart Van Assche writes: Bart> Is what you describe a theoretical concern or have you observed Bart> any issues that could have been caused by the rport mutex? I believe Ewan had some data. Ewan? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering