From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35 Regression: Ages spent discarding blocks that weren't used!
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:02:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq17hk6qmsd.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C5960B0.7020003@teksavvy.com> (Mark Lord's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:44:32 -0400")
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com> writes:
Mark> Looks to me like more and more things are using the block discard
Mark> functionality, and as predicted it is slowing things down
Mark> enormously.
Mark> The problem is that we still only discard tiny bits (a single
Mark> range still??) per TRIM command, rather than batching larger
Mark> ranges and larger numbers of ranges into single TRIM commands.
Mark> That's a very poor implementation, especially when things start
Mark> enabling it by default. Eg. the swap code, mke2fs, etc..
I'm working on aggregation. But it's harder than we initially
thought...
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 1:40 2.6.35 Regression: Ages spent discarding blocks that weren't used! Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-04 8:59 ` Stefan Richter
2010-08-04 8:59 ` Stefan Richter
2010-08-04 9:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-04 9:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-04 12:44 ` Mark Lord
2010-08-04 18:02 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2010-08-04 18:02 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-08-04 21:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-04 21:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-05 3:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-05 3:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-05 6:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-06 1:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-06 4:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-06 22:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-06 22:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-07 22:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-07 22:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-13 11:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-13 18:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-13 18:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-14 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-14 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-13 11:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-06 4:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-06 1:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-08-05 6:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-08-04 12:44 ` Mark Lord
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-04 1:40 Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq17hk6qmsd.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nigel@tuxonice.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.