From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: martin.petersen@oracle.com (Martin K. Petersen) Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 18:11:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting In-Reply-To: <20180529192329.GJ18442@mellanox.com> (Jason Gunthorpe's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 13:23:29 -0600") References: <1527436222-15494-1-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com> <1527436222-15494-2-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com> <20180528072130.GB5618@lst.de> <452bfcde-ee3c-a4e5-e2d0-43114099590a@mellanox.com> <20180528120359.GA13368@lst.de> <99191c8c-b03e-f40d-ffd9-a73e01d0ae2a@mellanox.com> <20180528163324.GF17491@mellanox.com> <6c7335c1-1d59-f764-be46-9aab46eb8458@mellanox.com> <20180529192329.GJ18442@mellanox.com> Message-ID: Jason, >> we must wait until Martin PR for sure... > > Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that > case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter > this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go > to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured > series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the > dependencies! I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:41964 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967058AbeE2WLx (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 18:11:53 -0400 To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Max Gurtovoy , "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , keith.busch@intel.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me, leon@kernel.org, oren@mellanox.com, idanb@mellanox.com, vladimirk@mellanox.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <1527436222-15494-1-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com> <1527436222-15494-2-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com> <20180528072130.GB5618@lst.de> <452bfcde-ee3c-a4e5-e2d0-43114099590a@mellanox.com> <20180528120359.GA13368@lst.de> <99191c8c-b03e-f40d-ffd9-a73e01d0ae2a@mellanox.com> <20180528163324.GF17491@mellanox.com> <6c7335c1-1d59-f764-be46-9aab46eb8458@mellanox.com> <20180529192329.GJ18442@mellanox.com> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 18:11:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180529192329.GJ18442@mellanox.com> (Jason Gunthorpe's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 13:23:29 -0600") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jason, >> we must wait until Martin PR for sure... > > Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that > case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter > this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go > to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured > series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the > dependencies! I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering