From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B226937F727; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 01:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786411564; cv=none; b=aElqKyoXW3i0lycJ1qnnNzRnjdF1VmgOSqiyzhLa0CU82rSYKk7ML/h8exd8gPkMJg0qwdUoTvBAsUJDkrpXpR29JluIU0SoWmLgGl4LXlCuWyeEOwQ/dFHaLrVhqvna1TGsvr9tzOIXsK1JswNqMYj7CWFJLJtB/6e46z+pAJE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786411564; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BGLpnE3xgDheX8oTIsp3EbEhk7oJln2dbgtrZtiP698=; h=To:Cc:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eq06DXeMo2Z1ljR4cFwbG0K7OlfmcaQLJcYvAyXMj35mvM8DfXqDndj95JTIF5LStxJncMiJGz1PQno7ASRvQoluAeEBRLHXudw8aL97wllY5UcmX1m3lbDhVSNBImLodgLwgMj0SeMXslDJnMmoe7MJZBe1jezU+k7+gzY3wCU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UoItw0P1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UoItw0P1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0195B1F000E9; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 01:26:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786411563; bh=uRleJ4eP/gnxUnbEgZpawqofU5wZ/GfdTOV4jzbOjc8=; h=To:Cc:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=UoItw0P1Wn7707HEIrCZ9ftvL2eOzi2ccUGIIWHivetEQtJ/zzlvWrS+lID4doM3H +batf/ArbRwkoz3gh314qNMl5BdD+zy+kiV9ndZu79VdGc3ZpCjrgnn0SIx19sWpNb uOAJOMV8ORngRUQYYOSAbqbGw7URxAZoSuji3qPFBdDsQY3jcb+l5ZWGCarWM39bD1 1DgenIZH1pQV4nTXV0RgXLX9JN2RHDMUMhpApblniCKp1z2pkzzGx1k5i92aNC8GtV /d39aTcghS2V7PAReo2dRQs0yDVMtPgvjQ+JAKEV3WIj7qnwZBnXMmqqvyKMehIh4k MPSgZC7Rw2PSg== To: Karan Tilak Kumar Cc: sebaddel@cisco.com, arulponn@cisco.com, djhawar@cisco.com, gcboffa@cisco.com, mkai2@cisco.com, satishkh@cisco.com, aeasi@cisco.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmeneghi@redhat.com, revers@redhat.com, adakopou@redhat.com, lduncan@suse.com, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fnic: Fix built-in NVMe/FC build From: "Martin K. Petersen (Oracle)" In-Reply-To: <20260810110627.4521-1-kartilak@cisco.com> (Karan Tilak Kumar's message of "Mon, 10 Aug 2026 04:06:27 -0700") Message-ID: References: <20260810110627.4521-1-kartilak@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:26:01 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karan, > The fnic NVMe/FC code is guarded with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVME_FC). > That also evaluates true when NVME_FC is built as a module. Applied to 7.3/scsi-staging, thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen