From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: "Bityutskiy\, Artem" Cc: "martin.petersen\@oracle.com" , "James.Bottomley\@HansenPartnership.com" , "axboe\@fb.com" , "ming.lei\@redhat.com" , "linux-block\@vger.kernel.org" , "snitzer\@redhat.com" , "hch\@lst.de" , "hare\@suse.de" , "mroos\@linux.ee" , "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" , "don.brace\@microsemi.com" , "pbonzini\@redhat.com" , "loberman\@redhat.com" , "kashyap.desai\@broadcom.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/5] scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20180313094243.8710-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180313094243.8710-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> <1521460114.4592.29.camel@intel.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:16:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1521460114.4592.29.camel@intel.com> (Artem Bityutskiy's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:48:35 +0000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Artem, > we have this patch-set and it fixes megaraid regression in v4.16. Do > you plan to mege it to v4.16-rcX? I am worried - there seem to be no > sight that this is going to me merged. They are not in the linux-next. I merged them into scsi-fixes last week. It happens push a combined fixes+queue to linux-next to get more zeroday coverage. However, most of the time linux-next is one 4.x+1 material only. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering