From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
"MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com"
<MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sd: Check for unaligned partial completion
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:24:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1ino226p7.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa814adb-b31a-432a-5128-86dcd53162e6@wdc.com> (Damien Le Moal's message of "Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:47:58 +0900")
>>>>> "Damien" == Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> writes:
Damien,
Damien> I think we would still need the check for REQ_TYPE_FS to avoid
Damien> interfering with SG_IO commands. As for the "medium access
Damien> command" test, I am not sure if the block layer is the right
Damien> place to define that since a request operation may map to
Damien> different commands depending on the device type
Yeah, we should put that logic in sd.c since that's the entity preparing
the commands.
Damien> Which approach do you prefer ? Keeping everything contained to
Damien> mpt3sas (so basically just fixing the problematic patch), or
Damien> cleaning up everything with sd_completed_bytes rewrite ?
I was originally in favor of just patching mpt3sas since it's clearly
broken (a disk can't write a partial sector). But I don't think a device
driver should know how to special case REPORT ZONES or similar. That's
clearly SBC/ZBC territory, so I prefer the sd_completed_bytes()
approach.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 0:01 [PATCH v5] sd: Check for unaligned partial completion Damien Le Moal
2017-02-17 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-20 0:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-02-20 17:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-21 1:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-02-21 2:35 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-21 3:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-02-21 4:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-21 4:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-21 7:47 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-02-22 4:24 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2017-02-22 5:01 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-02-23 4:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-02-23 4:53 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1ino226p7.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.