From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@gmail.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
lczerner@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Testing devices for discard support properly
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 22:29:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1lfzgicn6.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508215832.GR1454@dread.disaster.area> (Dave Chinner's message of "Thu, 9 May 2019 07:58:32 +1000")
Dave,
>> > WRITE SAME also has an ANCHOR flag which provides a use case we
>> > currently don't have fallocate plumbing for: Allocating blocks without
>> > caring about their contents. I.e. the blocks described by the I/O are
>> > locked down to prevent ENOSPC for future writes.
>
> So WRITE_SAME (0) with an ANCHOR flag does not return zeroes on
> subsequent reads? i.e. it is effectively
> fallocate(FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE) preallocation semantics?
The answer is that it depends. It can return zeroes or a device-specific
initialization pattern (oh joy).
> For many use cases cases we actually want zeroed space to be
> guaranteed so we don't expose stale data from previous device use into
> the new user's visibility - can that be done with WRITE_SAME and the
> ANCHOR flag?
That's just a regular zeroout.
We have:
Allocate and zero: FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE
Deallocate and zero: FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
Deallocate: FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE
but are missing:
Allocate: FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE
The devices that implement anchor semantics are few and far between. I
have yet to see one.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-09 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-06 20:56 Testing devices for discard support properly Ric Wheeler
2019-05-07 7:10 ` Lukas Czerner
2019-05-07 8:48 ` Jan Tulak
2019-05-07 9:40 ` Lukas Czerner
2019-05-07 12:57 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-07 15:35 ` Bryan Gurney
2019-05-07 15:44 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-07 20:09 ` Bryan Gurney
2019-05-07 21:24 ` Chris Mason
2019-06-03 20:01 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-07 8:21 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-07 22:04 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-08 0:07 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-08 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-08 15:05 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-08 17:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-05-08 17:09 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-08 17:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-05-08 18:12 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-09 16:02 ` Bryan Gurney
2019-05-09 17:27 ` Ric Wheeler
2019-05-09 20:35 ` Bryan Gurney
2019-05-08 21:58 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-09 2:29 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2019-05-09 3:20 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-09 4:35 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-05-08 16:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-05-08 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-09 3:55 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-05-09 13:40 ` Ric Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1lfzgicn6.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricwheeler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.