From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi-mkp tree Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:17:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170222134119.42f26068@canb.auug.org.au> <20170223080639.753ac411@canb.auug.org.au> <1487797987.2376.31.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:51937 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932760AbdBVVRZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:17:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1487797987.2376.31.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (James Bottomley's message of "Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:13:07 -0500") Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Smart , Dick Kennedy , Hannes Reinecke >>>>> "James" == James Bottomley writes: James> Perhaps it would be nice to rebase so we don't get bisect into a James> build failure. My plan was to start 4.11/scsi-fixes based on linus/master. I need block and net to satisfy dependencies for the remaining patches in the queue. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering