From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND] discuss blk-mq related to DM-multipath and status of XCOPY Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:39:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <54AA90B1.1030201@suse.de> <54ACEF13.7000508@suse.de> <54AE2436.2000004@suse.de> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54AE2436.2000004@suse.de> (Hannes Reinecke's message of "Thu, 08 Jan 2015 07:31:18 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Christoph Hellwig , device-mapper development , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "Martin K. Petersen" List-Id: dm-devel.ids >>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke writes: Hannes> But the array might prioritize 'normal' I/O requests, and treat Hannes> XCOPY with a lower priority. So given enough load XCOPY might Hannes> actually be slower than a normal copy ... Yes, but may have lower impact on concurrent I/O. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering