From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 21:39:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1woowzjwv.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181129021521.GB23390@ming.t460p> (Ming Lei's message of "Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:15:22 +0800")
Ming,
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 06:07:01PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> > > Is this the nvme target on top of null_blk?
>> >
>> > Yes.
>>
>> And it goes away if you revert just the last patch?
>
> Today I run this test again and can't reproduce it any more.
>
> So maybe not a new issue, and it is just triggered in yesterday's
> for-4.21/block, :-)
Can you reproduce with yesterday's tree then?
I'm obviously a bit concerned about merging something without knowing
the cause of the problems you were seeing.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-29 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 16:54 [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates Keith Busch
2018-11-26 16:54 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] blk-mq: Return true if request was completed Keith Busch
2018-11-26 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:54 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions Keith Busch
2018-11-26 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:54 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] blk-mq: Simplify request completion state Keith Busch
2018-11-26 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 17:33 ` [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 2:20 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 10:07 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 10:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 15:49 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-28 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 16:26 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-28 16:31 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 17:56 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-29 1:18 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 22:31 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-28 23:36 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-29 17:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-29 17:20 ` Keith Busch
2018-12-28 12:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-29 2:15 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29 2:39 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2018-11-29 8:12 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1woowzjwv.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.