From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] md: Use new topology calls to indicate alignment and I/O sizes
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:54:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1ws73turf.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
Neil,
Looks like this one missed the boat on the first MD pull request.
Here's an updated patch that applies to Linus' current tree in case you
are planning a second round...
Switch MD over to the new disk_stack_limits() function which checks for
aligment and adjusts preferred I/O sizes when stacking.
Also indicate preferred I/O sizes where applicable.
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/md/linear.c b/drivers/md/linear.c
index 15c8b7b..7df78b9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/linear.c
+++ b/drivers/md/linear.c
@@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ static linear_conf_t *linear_conf(mddev_t *mddev, int raid_disks)
rdev->sectors = sectors * mddev->chunk_sectors;
}
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue,
- rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue);
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, so limit ->max_sector to one PAGE, as
* a one page request is never in violation.
diff --git a/drivers/md/multipath.c b/drivers/md/multipath.c
index cbe368f..d48f72a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/multipath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/multipath.c
@@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ static int multipath_add_disk(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
for (path = first; path <= last; path++)
if ((p=conf->multipaths+path)->rdev == NULL) {
q = rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue;
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue, q);
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, so limit ->max_sector to one PAGE, as
@@ -463,9 +464,9 @@ static int multipath_run (mddev_t *mddev)
disk = conf->multipaths + disk_idx;
disk->rdev = rdev;
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue,
- rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, not that we ever expect a device with
* a merge_bvec_fn to be involved in multipath */
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
index ab4a489..12cd1eb 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ static int create_strip_zones(mddev_t *mddev)
}
dev[j] = rdev1;
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue,
- rdev1->bdev->bd_disk->queue);
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev1->bdev,
+ rdev1->data_offset);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, so limit ->max_sector to one PAGE, as
* a one page request is never in violation.
@@ -250,6 +250,11 @@ static int create_strip_zones(mddev_t *mddev)
mddev->chunk_sectors << 9);
goto abort;
}
+
+ blk_queue_io_min(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors << 9);
+ blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue,
+ (mddev->chunk_sectors << 9) * mddev->raid_disks);
+
printk(KERN_INFO "raid0: done.\n");
mddev->private = conf;
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
index 89939a7..174c4dd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -1123,8 +1123,8 @@ static int raid1_add_disk(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
for (mirror = first; mirror <= last; mirror++)
if ( !(p=conf->mirrors+mirror)->rdev) {
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue,
- rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue);
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, so limit ->max_sector to one PAGE, as
* a one page request is never in violation.
@@ -1988,9 +1988,8 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
disk = conf->mirrors + disk_idx;
disk->rdev = rdev;
-
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue,
- rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue);
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, so limit ->max_sector to one PAGE, as
* a one page request is never in violation.
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index ae12cea..032e791 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1151,8 +1151,8 @@ static int raid10_add_disk(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
for ( ; mirror <= last ; mirror++)
if ( !(p=conf->mirrors+mirror)->rdev) {
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue,
- rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue);
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, so limit ->max_sector to one PAGE, as
* a one page request is never in violation.
@@ -2044,7 +2044,7 @@ raid10_size(mddev_t *mddev, sector_t sectors, int raid_disks)
static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
{
conf_t *conf;
- int i, disk_idx;
+ int i, disk_idx, chunk_size;
mirror_info_t *disk;
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
int nc, fc, fo;
@@ -2130,6 +2130,14 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
spin_lock_init(&conf->device_lock);
mddev->queue->queue_lock = &conf->device_lock;
+ chunk_size = mddev->chunk_sectors << 9;
+ blk_queue_io_min(mddev->queue, chunk_size);
+ if (conf->raid_disks % conf->near_copies)
+ blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue, chunk_size * conf->raid_disks);
+ else
+ blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue, chunk_size *
+ (conf->raid_disks / conf->near_copies));
+
list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
disk_idx = rdev->raid_disk;
if (disk_idx >= mddev->raid_disks
@@ -2138,9 +2146,8 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
disk = conf->mirrors + disk_idx;
disk->rdev = rdev;
-
- blk_queue_stack_limits(mddev->queue,
- rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue);
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must never risk
* violating it, so limit ->max_sector to one PAGE, as
* a one page request is never in violation.
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index f9f991e..d363489 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -4452,7 +4452,7 @@ static raid5_conf_t *setup_conf(mddev_t *mddev)
static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
{
raid5_conf_t *conf;
- int working_disks = 0;
+ int working_disks = 0, chunk_size;
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
if (mddev->recovery_cp != MaxSector)
@@ -4607,6 +4607,14 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
md_set_array_sectors(mddev, raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0));
blk_queue_merge_bvec(mddev->queue, raid5_mergeable_bvec);
+ chunk_size = mddev->chunk_sectors << 9;
+ blk_queue_io_min(mddev->queue, chunk_size);
+ blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue, chunk_size *
+ (conf->raid_disks - conf->max_degraded));
+
+ list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set)
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset);
return 0;
abort:
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 4:54 Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2009-06-23 21:44 ` [PATCH] md: Use new topology calls to indicate alignment and I/O sizes Mike Snitzer
2009-06-24 4:05 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-24 5:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-24 6:22 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-24 15:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-06-24 16:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-06-24 23:28 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-25 0:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-24 17:07 ` [PATCH] " Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-25 2:35 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-25 4:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-25 6:16 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-25 16:24 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-30 20:24 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-06-30 23:58 ` Neil Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-09 4:31 [PATCH] " Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-09 5:02 ` NeilBrown
2009-06-10 6:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-06-11 10:25 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-12 4:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1ws73turf.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.