All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Kameron Carr <kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/11] coco: guest: arm64: Hook TSM accept to Realm TDISP RUN transition
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:17:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5aik4yx0uo.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f086f940-edaa-4bd5-ba11-e52e61fd6cee@linux.microsoft.com>

Kameron Carr <kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com> writes:

> On 4/27/2026 1:28 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
 
...

> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Present the private mmio range in the resource hierarchy.
>> +	 * We don't use this for ioremap, ioremap check the RIPAS value.
>> +	 */
>> +	ret = pci_tsm_mmio_setup(pdev, tsm_mmio);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		pci_err(pdev, "Protected mmio setup failure\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = cca_map_evidence_report_range(pdev, tsm_mmio);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		pci_err(pdev, "failed to validate the interface report\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = rhi_vdev_set_tdi_state(pdev, RHI_DA_TDI_CONFIG_RUN);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		pci_err(pdev, "failed to switch the device (%u) to RUN state\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>
> After calling pci_tsm_mmio_setup() we have mappings from insert_resource()
> then failures from later return codes never call mmio_teardown() so
> remove_resource() is never called, only kfree on the tsm_mmio.
>
> Likewise after cca_map_evidence_report_range() the mmio entry memory ranges
> have state RIPAS_DEV. Later failures never restore RIPAS_EMPTY.
>
> Could clean up be handled better? Is there a reason these failures don't
> have a rollback path?
>

Thanks for the review. I’ll incorporate these changes in the next
version.

-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-27  8:27 [RFC PATCH v4 00/11] coco/TSM: Arm CCA guest TDISP lock/accept flow with verification and DMA enable Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27  8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/11] coco: guest: arm64: Guest TSM callback and realm device lock support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27  8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/11] coco: guest: arm64: Fix a typo in the ARM_CCA_GUEST Kconfig help string ("and" -> "an") Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27  8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add Realm Host Interface and guest DA helper Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-21  3:42   ` Kameron Carr
2026-04-27  8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/11] coco: guest: arm64: Support guest-initiated TDI lock/unlock transitions Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27  8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/11] coco: guest: arm64: Refresh interface-report cache during device lock Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27  8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add measurement refresh via RHI_DA_VDEV_GET_MEASUREMENTS Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27  8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add guest APIs to read host-cached DA objects Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-18 17:43   ` Kameron Carr
2026-08-20 11:13     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-27  8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/11] coco: guest: arm64: Verify DA evidence with RSI_VDEV_GET_INFO digests Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-19 16:43   ` Kameron Carr
2026-08-20 11:18     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-27  8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/11] coco: guest: arm64: Hook TSM accept to Realm TDISP RUN transition Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-24 22:28   ` Kameron Carr
2026-08-25  4:47     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-04-27  8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/11] coco: arm64: dma: Update force_dma_unencrypted for accepted devices Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27  8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/11] coco: guest: arm64: Enable vdev DMA after attestation Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq5aik4yx0uo.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.