From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
christian.koenig@amd.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, aik@amd.com,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, vivek.kasireddy@intel.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, yilun.xu@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de,
yan.y.zhao@intel.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, leon@kernel.org,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, zhenzhong.duan@intel.com,
tao1.su@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, zhiw@nvidia.com,
simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, kevin.tian@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/30] iommufd/device: Add TSM Bind/Unbind for TIO support
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:13:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5awm9ujouz.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529053513.1592088-18-yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com> writes:
....
> +/**
> + * iommufd_device_tsm_bind - Move a device to TSM Bind state
> + * @idev: device to attach
> + * @vdev_id: Input a IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE
> + *
> + * This configures for device Confidential Computing(CC), and moves the device
> + * to the TSM Bind state. Once this completes the device is locked down (TDISP
> + * CONFIG_LOCKED or RUN), waiting for guest's attestation.
> + *
> + * This function is undone by calling iommufd_device_tsm_unbind().
> + */
> +int iommufd_device_tsm_bind(struct iommufd_device *idev, u32 vdevice_id)
> +{
> + struct iommufd_vdevice *vdev;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!dev_is_pci(idev->dev))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + vdev = container_of(iommufd_get_object(idev->ictx, vdevice_id, IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE),
> + struct iommufd_vdevice, obj);
> + if (IS_ERR(vdev))
> + return PTR_ERR(vdev);
> +
> + if (vdev->dev != idev->dev) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_vdev;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&idev->igroup->lock);
> + if (idev->vdev) {
> + rc = -EEXIST;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + rc = iommufd_vdevice_tsm_bind(vdev);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + idev->vdev = vdev;
> + refcount_inc(&vdev->obj.users);
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->igroup->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Pairs with iommufd_device_tsm_unbind() - catches caller bugs attempting
> + * to destroy a bound device.
> + */
> + refcount_inc(&idev->obj.users);
>
Do we really need this refcount_inc? As I understand it, the objects
aren't being pinned directly. Instead, the reference count seems to be
used more as a way to establish an object hierarchy, ensuring that
objects are freed in the correct order.
In vfio_pci_core_close_device(), you’re decrementing the reference, and
on the iommufd side, we’re covered because the VFIO bind operation takes
a file reference (fget)—so iommufd_fops_release() won’t be called
prematurely.
Wouldn’t it be simpler to skip the reference count increment altogether
and just call tsm_unbind in the virtual device’s destroy callback?
(iommufd_vdevice_destroy())
> + goto out_put_vdev;
> +
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->igroup->lock);
> +out_put_vdev:
> + iommufd_put_object(idev->ictx, &vdev->obj);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_device_tsm_bind, "IOMMUFD");
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 5:34 [RFC PATCH 00/30] Host side (KVM/VFIO/IOMMUFD) support for TDISP using TSM Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 01/30] HACK: dma-buf: Introduce dma_buf_get_pfn_unlocked() kAPI Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 02/30] vfio: Export vfio device get and put registration helpers Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 03/30] vfio/pci: Share the core device pointer while invoking feature functions Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 04/30] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 05/30] fixup! vfio/pci: fix dma-buf revoke typo on reset Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 06/30] HACK: vfio/pci: Support get_pfn() callback for dma-buf Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 07/30] KVM: Support vfio_dmabuf backed MMIO region Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 08/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for vfio_dmabuf backed MMIO Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 09/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private MMIO Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 10/30] vfio/pci: Export vfio dma-buf specific info for importers Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 13:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-03 5:01 ` Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 11/30] KVM: vfio_dmabuf: Fetch VFIO specific dma-buf data for sanity check Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 12/30] iommufd/device: Associate a kvm pointer to iommufd_device Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 13/30] fixup! iommufd/selftest: Sync iommufd_device_bind() change to selftest Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 14/30] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd: Pass in kvm pointer to viommu_alloc Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 15/30] fixup: iommu/selftest: Sync .viommu_alloc() change to selftest Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 16/30] iommufd/viommu: track the kvm pointer & its refcount in viommu core Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 17/30] iommufd/device: Add TSM Bind/Unbind for TIO support Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 12:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2025-06-03 6:20 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-03 12:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-04 8:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-04 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-06 7:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 18/30] iommufd/viommu: Add trusted IOMMU configuration handlers for vdev Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 19/30] vfio/pci: Add TSM TDI bind/unbind IOCTLs for TEE-IO support Xu Yilun
2025-06-01 10:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-02 14:43 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-04 13:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-05 9:41 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-05 15:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-06 3:25 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-05 16:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-16 8:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-18 4:54 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-05 12:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-05 15:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-05 16:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-05 16:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-06 4:26 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-06 9:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-06 12:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 20/30] vfio/pci: Do TSM Unbind before zapping bars Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 5:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-02 13:56 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 14:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-03 4:50 ` Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 21/30] iommufd/vdevice: Add TSM Guest request uAPI Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 22/30] fixup! PCI/TSM: Change the guest request type definition Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 23/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Introduce a "tdx" subsystem and "tsm" device Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 24/30] coco/tdx_tsm: TEE Security Manager driver for TDX Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 25/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Add connect()/disconnect() handlers prototype Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 26/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Add bind()/unbind()/guest_req() " Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 27/30] PCI/TSM: Add PCI driver callbacks to handle TSM requirements Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 13:06 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-03 5:52 ` Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 28/30] vfio/pci: Implement TSM handlers for MMIO Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 29/30] iommufd/vdevice: Implement TSM handlers for trusted DMA Xu Yilun
2025-05-29 5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 30/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Manage TDX Module enforced operation sequences for Unbind Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 00/30] Host side (KVM/VFIO/IOMMUFD) support for TDISP using TSM Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-20 4:21 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-11 1:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-06-21 1:07 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-06-25 10:45 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11 23:08 ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-15 11:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5awm9ujouz.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tao1.su@intel.com \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.