From: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: hca@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/idle: Fix suspicious RCU usage
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:53:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yt9dimbm79qi.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908133031.GT1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (peterz@infradead.org's message of "Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:30:31 +0200")
Hi Peter,
peterz@infradead.org writes:
> After commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") the
> lock tracepoints are visible to lockdep and RCU-lockdep is finding a
> bunch more RCU violations that were previously hidden.
>
> Switch the idle->seqcount over to using raw_write_*() to avoid the
> lockdep annotation and thus the lock tracepoints.
>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> [..]
I'm still seeing the splat below on s390 when irq tracing is enabled:
[ 1273.747948] =============================
[ 1273.747953] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 1273.747960] 5.9.0-20201006.rc8.git0.162c12a918a1.300.fc32.s390x+debug #1 Not tainted
[ 1273.747965] -----------------------------
[ 1273.747971] include/trace/events/lock.h:74 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[ 1273.747976] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1273.747982] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[ 1273.747987] RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
[ 1273.747993] 1 lock held by swapper/8/0:
[ 1273.747998] #0: 000000010f7281b8 (max_trace_lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: check_critical_timing+0x7c/0x1c8
[ 1273.748019] stack backtrace:
[ 1273.748034] CPU: 8 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/8 Not tainted 5.9.0-20201006.rc8.git0.162c12a918a1.300.fc32.s390x+debug #1
[ 1273.748040] Hardware name: IBM 2964 NC9 702 (z/VM 6.4.0)
[ 1273.748045] Call Trace:
[ 1273.748053] [<000000010e656de0>] show_stack+0x90/0xf8
[ 1273.748060] [<000000010eea94da>] dump_stack+0xa2/0xd8
[ 1273.748068] [<000000010e711cc8>] trace_lock_acquired+0x178/0x180
[ 1273.748075] [<000000010e718ed4>] lock_contended+0x24/0xd8
[ 1273.748083] [<000000010f26d148>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb0/0xd8
[ 1273.748089] [<000000010e7ec404>] check_critical_timing+0x7c/0x1c8
[ 1273.748096] [<000000010e7ecaa8>] tracer_hardirqs_on+0x128/0x148
[ 1273.748103] [<000000010e7eae0c>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x6c/0x1b0
[ 1273.748110] [<000000010e644ba8>] arch_cpu_idle+0x28/0x38
[ 1273.748116] [<000000010f26ccd6>] default_idle_call+0x56/0x98
[ 1273.748124] [<000000010e6da81a>] do_idle+0xf2/0x1b0
[ 1273.748130] [<000000010e6dab4e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x36/0x40
[ 1273.748137] [<000000010e6590fa>] smp_start_secondary+0x82/0x88
[ 1273.748142] 1 lock held by swapper/8/0:
[ 1273.748147] #0: 000000010f7281b8 (max_trace_lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: check_critical_timing+0x7c/0x1c8
I think this happens because trace_lock_acquired gets called from idle
context?
Regards
Sven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 13:30 [PATCH] s390/idle: Fix suspicious RCU usage peterz
2020-09-08 13:41 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-10-07 7:53 ` Sven Schnelle [this message]
2020-10-07 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-07 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-08 8:58 ` Sven Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yt9dimbm79qi.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.