From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Packard Subject: Re: i915 native backlight never got merged Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:27:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1312829662.3379.138.camel@fourier> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0608746994==" Return-path: Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496069E777 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:27:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1312829662.3379.138.camel@fourier> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Kamal Mostafa , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matthew Garrett Cc: Andrew Morton List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0608746994== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:54:22 -0700, Kamal Mostafa wro= te: > So what happened to that patch? Did it get lost or is it stuck > somewhere? I humbly ask that it be re-reviewed and pushed upstream. Afraid it was forgotten -- Matthew, is this patch still useful? =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOQFTSQp8BWwlsTdMRAmWuAKDBSlBibGM8b586lEJ6pNKgG55VDACeKWTD zhnZkLwNJ4gWSo6x7xbD57Y= =m55I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============0608746994== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx --===============0608746994==--