From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (Måns Rullgård)
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DMA transfers in 2.5.67
Date: 16 Apr 2003 10:59:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xadeqes1s.fsf@zaphod.guide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1xk7duessc.fsf@zaphod.guide>
mru@users.sourceforge.net (Måns Rullgård) writes:
> > > Btw, I just noticed that hard disk throughput is much lower with 2.5
> > > than 2.4. With 2.4.21-pre5 I get ~40 MB/s, but with 2.5.67 the speed
> > > drops to 25-30 MB/s. Everything according to hdparm. Is it possible
> > > that DMA is generally slow for some reason?
> >
> > Possible reason is that in 2.4 we've forced reasonable latency timer
> > value for all PCI devices, while in 2.5 we haven't as yet.
>
> Do you mean whatever causes this message (for a 3com NIC)?
>
> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:05.0 to 64
>
> Would that also explain why my hard disks are slow under 2.5? There
> is no corresponding message for the ide controller (htp374).
I just checked the troublesome board. Here's what lspci has to say:
00:06.0 Display controller: 3DLabs GLINT R3 (rev 01)
Subsystem: 3DLabs: Unknown device 0121
Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 27
Memory at 0000000009020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Memory at 000000000c000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
Memory at 0000000010000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
Expansion ROM at 0000000009060000 [disabled] [size=64K]
Capabilities: <available only to root>
The latency 0 doesn't look too good. What should I do to change it?
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-16 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-15 20:01 DMA transfers in 2.5.67 Måns Rullgård
2003-04-15 20:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-15 21:38 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-04-15 20:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-15 22:09 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-04-16 8:36 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-04-16 8:43 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-04-16 8:59 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2003-04-16 9:30 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-04-16 10:01 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-04-16 10:11 ` Måns Rullgård
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-16 9:45 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-16 10:11 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-16 10:13 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-16 10:13 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-04-18 11:25 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xadeqes1s.fsf@zaphod.guide \
--to=mru@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.