From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261302AbTDOMS5 (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:18:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261312AbTDOMS5 (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:18:57 -0400 Received: from c-97a870d5.037-69-73746f23.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([213.112.168.151]:53889 "EHLO zaphod.guide") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261302AbTDOMS4 (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:18:56 -0400 To: Andreas Henriksson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Writing modules for 2.5 References: <20030415121517.GA23894@foo> From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Date: 15 Apr 2003 14:30:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030415121517.GA23894@foo> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Henriksson writes: > > Next question: what is the correct replacement for MOD_INC_USE_COUNT? > > "SET_MODULE_OWNER(dev);" or simply "dev->owner=THIS_MODULE;" and the > counting should then be done automatically AFAIK. OK, but what might dev be and when should this be done? What about MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT? -- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net