From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: Some proposed ALSA sysfs changes to stock kernel from GregKH Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:12:51 +0100 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <400C9CA1.6030706@starhub.net.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org R Chan writes: > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any > impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always > build 2.6 from the stock tree and then immediately overwrite the > sound directory with ALSA CVS. Those patches do not apply cleanly to the latest ALSA version. There are some minor conflicts, all easily resolved. I'm not sure whether anything else depends on the ALSA changes, but I wouldn't think so. I've been running ALSA 1.0.1 merged with Greg's patches for some time, and it seems to be working well. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn