From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: References: <1070653985.2686.2.camel@gecko.indygecko.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM or LVM2? Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Dec 5 13:59:01 2003 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Jord Tanner writes: > I know this is the LVM list, and I may be shot for saying this, but I > have found EVMS to be fabulous. The curses based interface is good, and > the X interface is fantastic. Others will certainly have other opinions, > and as always YMMV. I generally try to judge things on this level of the system by what they actually accomplish, and how well they perform, rather than the look of some configuration utility. I haven't seen the EVMS tools, but I suppose someone could write similar looking tools for LVM. -- M�ns Rullg�rd mru@kth.se