From: "Måns Rullgård" <mru@inprovide.com>
To: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
phil.el@wanadoo.fr, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Is OPROFILE actively maintained?
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 18:50:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xwtce0x0b.fsf@agrajag.inprovide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060522151528.GA20960@totally.trollied.org> (John Levon's message of "Mon, 22 May 2006 16:15:28 +0100")
John Levon <levon@movementarian.org> writes:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> Be serious, oprofile is good working code, even if you have some
>> personal problem with it.
>
> Does the opinion of the former mantainer count for nothing? If nothing
> else, it should remain experimental on arches like Alpha, where there's
> a whole bunch of events that can't possibly work.
Why should be marked experimental only because of architecture limits?
If the parts that can work, work well, there's no reason to suggest
otherwise. (Speaking as an Alpha owner)
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-22 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-20 2:53 [PATCH] i386 Don't conside oprofile EXPERIMENTAL anymore Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 19:49 ` Is OPROFILE actively maintained? Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 19:57 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 20:17 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 20:49 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 20:56 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 20:25 ` John Levon
2006-05-22 11:51 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-22 15:15 ` John Levon
2006-05-22 17:50 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2006-05-22 18:13 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-22 15:27 ` Chris Wedgwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xwtce0x0b.fsf@agrajag.inprovide.com \
--to=mru@inprovide.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=levon@movementarian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.