alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Katsuhiro Suzuki" <suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: uniphier: remove redundant check of PLL ID
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:54:43 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001e01d4090b$34b3b5f0$9e1b21d0$@socionext.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621024346.13131-1-suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>

Hello,

I got mistake (forget to remove unused variable).
I'll send v2. Sorry for confusing.

Regards,
--
Katsuhiro Suzuki


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Katsuhiro Suzuki <suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 11:44 AM
> To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>; Jassi Brar
> <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Suzuki, Katsuhiro/鈴木 勝博
> <suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: uniphier: remove redundant check of PLL ID
> 
> This patch removes redudant check of PLL ID. struct uniphier_aio_pll
> enable member has already been checked at is_valid_pll().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c b/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c
> index 2d9b7dde2ffa..cfe69ab44b63 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c
> @@ -224,10 +224,6 @@ static int uniphier_aio_set_pll(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
int
> pll_id,
> 
>  	if (!is_valid_pll(aio->chip, pll_id))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	if (!aio->chip->plls[pll_id].enable) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "PLL(%d) is not implemented\n", pll_id);
> -		return -ENOTSUPP;
> -	}
> 
>  	ret = aio_chip_set_pll(aio->chip, pll_id, freq_out);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> --
> 2.17.1

      reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21  2:43 [PATCH] ASoC: uniphier: remove redundant check of PLL ID Katsuhiro Suzuki
2018-06-21  2:54 ` Katsuhiro Suzuki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001e01d4090b$34b3b5f0$9e1b21d0$@socionext.com' \
    --to=suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).