From: Manuel Jander <manuel.jander@mat.utfsm.cl>
To: Ryan Underwood <nemesis-lists@icequake.net>
Cc: Alsa Devel list <alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: MIDI velocity rewriting
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 08:44:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1065617099.1780.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031008042134.GB3451@dbz.icequake.net>
Hi Ryan,
I encountered this same problem time ago on Windows using CakeWalk
Proaudio. But in this case, CakeWalk Proaudio provides a function to add
a offset to all MIDI notes on a given track. This isn't the best
solution since you loose dynamic range. Scaling would be better.
Having a solution like this in the library level, common for all
applications sounds reasonable to me. Many keyboards don't use the full
7 bit scale, so that could be considered as a "Hardware configuration
parameter".
I suggest: write a patch, and show it to Takashi and Jaroslav. They are
the boss around here :D
Best Regards
Manuel
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:21, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A problem that I have on some MIDI keyboards is that the velocity
> information sent by the keyboard is just too low. Banging on the
> keyboard only results in a velocity of 90 for instance, instead of 127.
> I can fix this in MIDI that I have captured by scanning for note-on
> messages and adding either a fixed amount to them, or using a curve so
> that notes closer to the max are only increased a little, where ones
> that are very low get increased a lot.
>
> The question is, does anyone know of any other way to make a MIDI louder
> besides setting the master volume of the performer to highest, and doing
> this rewriting of velocity information? If not, I also had the idea
> that perhaps this would be a useful thing to do in the ALSA MIDI layer.
> For example, if the user specified to do so, the ALSA layer would
> automatically increase velocity in the desired way for each note-on
> message that comes from a given channel into the computer.
>
> Of course there are probably things I haven't thought about, but
> comments would be appreciated.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-08 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-08 4:21 MIDI velocity rewriting Ryan Underwood
2003-10-08 12:44 ` Manuel Jander [this message]
2003-10-08 13:03 ` Takashi Iwai
[not found] ` <NDBBLGIKBJENLAMOLFHGOENODHAB.mknecht@controlnet.com>
2003-10-15 21:42 ` Ryan Underwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1065617099.1780.5.camel@localhost \
--to=manuel.jander@mat.utfsm.cl \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nemesis-lists@icequake.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox