Re: spam

Lee Revell
2005-07-24T22:44:35Z

On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 16:30 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 13:18 -0700, Tom Watson wrote:
> > 2) A notice should be posted. Some people have their mailers configured
> > to send HTML as well as plain text (why is a big question to me).
> > 3) Perhaps a 'bounce' if the message is in HTML (I'm kinda iffy on this
> > one).
>
> I think we need to just drop it on the floor. A bounce would just sit
> in the outbound queue forever because most spammers don't take bounces.
> It's not worth the trouble for the tiny percentage of non-spam html
> mail.
>

I opened a trouble ticket for the spam problem: