Re: spam

Lee Revell
2005-07-23T20:30:26Z

On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 13:18 -0700, Tom Watson wrote:
> 2) A notice should be posted. Some people have their mailers configured
> to send HTML as well as plain text (why is a big question to me).
> 3) Perhaps a 'bounce' if the message is in HTML (I'm kinda iffy on this
> one).

I think we need to just drop it on the floor. A bounce would just sit
in the outbound queue forever because most spammers don't take bounces.
It's not worth the trouble for the tiny percentage of non-spam html
mail.