From: Adrian McMenamin <adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: pointer callback in pcm
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:51:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142020261.9246.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141952015.13319.90.camel@mindpipe>
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 19:53 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 22:21 +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > The documentation states:
> >
> > "This callback is called when the PCM middle layer inquires the current
> > hardware position on the buffer."
> >
> >
> > Does that mean the position the hardware is at (in its ring buffer in my
> > case) or does it mean the position we are at in the dma buffer.
> >
> > ie I have a 128k DMA buffer which transfers samples into the 32k
> > hardware memory buffer. Which position am I meant to be reporting?
> >
>
> The DMA buffer should be the same size as the hardware buffer, so the
> positions should be the same.
>
> The pointer callback should return the position of sample that the
> hardware is currently playing.
>
Thanks. I am sure I am driving you round the twist now, but that (both
buffers being the same size) was a key piece of information I was
unaware of. There are several pints in it if you are ever around in
North London :)
But my basic problem remains - my buffer is 8 periods long and I get to
hear them over and over again :( - nothing new is ever fed into the DMA
buffer and so nothing new therefore ever gets fed into the hardware
buffer.
I start the process by transferring a whole eight periods worth into the
hardware buffer is that a mistake? Should I always be feeding in one
period at a time only?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-10 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-09 22:21 pointer callback in pcm Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-10 0:53 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-10 19:51 ` Adrian McMenamin [this message]
2006-03-10 20:16 ` Takashi Iwai
2006-03-10 20:21 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-10 20:23 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-11 11:16 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-03-11 11:27 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-11 15:42 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-03-11 15:53 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-11 17:30 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-11 18:47 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-03-11 19:08 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-11 19:15 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-03-11 19:18 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-11 19:37 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-03-11 19:55 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-11 19:26 ` Adrian McMenamin
2006-03-11 19:35 ` James Courtier-Dutton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1142020261.9246.3.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox