Re: Re: Ludicrous amount of spam on this list

[Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>]

On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 22:53 -0600, Eric Shattow wrote:
> Sorry, it was mentioned that the spam is only 10%;   I am experiencing
> 50% or higher spam versus actual content here.  FYI.  Using filters,
> the bugtracker info is easy enough to sort out.
> 

Yes X-Spam-Score.*++++ should help a lot...

> On 3/14/06, Florian Schlichting <Florian.Schlichting@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:25:15PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:05:27 +0000,
> > > Måns Rullgård wrote:
> > > > the bug reporter.  I agree that there is a lot of noise from the bug
> > > > tracker on the list.  It would help if the subject lines used a
> > > > shorter prefix so the actual subject was visible even when the mail
> > > > reader truncates it to fit the window.
> > >
> > > Yep, agreed that the mail from mantis could be more simplified to be
> > > suitable for ML.
> >
> > And I think it would be useful if bug tracker emails contained a header
> > like References: or In-Reply-To: with the bug number or some such id, so
> > that all emails coming from the same bug report can be grouped in one
> > thread - and read or discarded together, according to interest.
> >
> > Florian
> >
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFEFtxK/R0+cAphf/kRAi55AKDlxzh7RnOOVcja4zxRXDTCPHqUIwCghvht
> > MA/ya892LSZdxsi0Dw4Bv44=
> > =IA2D
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >
> &#0;N\x18HS^隊X'u<ڂ.y"\v\x1c*mx%jx.j\a^קvƩXjبȧ\x1emݚv&קv^+jZ{az^h஋n){h\x18\x1cا׫+h(mZ\x1fjY\x1awǥrg@y$5Oxḝ\x03n5m\x1dj5^	liׯzYXX	liׯzYb,y+޶^[m+-.ǟ\x1e\x7f+-bا~ږƝz



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642