From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2B5C25B75 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 14:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B69BDEC; Fri, 31 May 2024 16:48:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 1B69BDEC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1717166939; bh=qjG5sk5AW4DnjPOlkdayQAmvAKdwXxis0W1RtTvM0YY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Archive:List-Help:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=rZMjN1mb4WdK0oAoimN2lZaLFoHpfCnEhXMdq1A3j2rJeHhrs1BHESbxVBtOFHuUo koj8IijW21nbPbpjJ2qzCedmp3f/FyGoV7BDveB+Kb6LDdhWmhLfR6CLYd+s0WvSDP PJos4xIKi7m6YWaJTVshVDX4Aw+w22nDx2lG5Xes= Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id ED9E4F805A9; Fri, 31 May 2024 16:48:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailman-core.alsa-project.org (mailman-core.alsa-project.org [10.254.200.10]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79099F8026D; Fri, 31 May 2024 16:48:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 9D1AFF8047C; Fri, 31 May 2024 16:48:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [208.88.110.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEAE5F8003A for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 16:48:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz BEAE5F8003A Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=savoirfairelinux.com header.i=@savoirfairelinux.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=DFC430D2-D198-11EC-948E-34200CB392D2 header.b=SdiCNzQZ Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.savoirfairelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652479C584C; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP id X9AwXBwr79HS; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.savoirfairelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA82F9C58D5; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.savoirfairelinux.com CA82F9C58D5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=savoirfairelinux.com; s=DFC430D2-D198-11EC-948E-34200CB392D2; t=1717166894; bh=kchiTinbtwESPzQeP7Vb31GmvIj0rK/lVr0ouZd4gSo=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=SdiCNzQZ1hd90TLzQQg+YhNcEKlzhtyi0dMmWZsuakVAg4zC8oa8Ln/wuzFtjnZK6 umuqOtoS5gkAHEBujnoCEOKYsXDvBh7k4WB/XCvwIBLWucfTHY73fNM4O9rU+BqSur biWGtwErgzOoA/ZiQJHHv24hgOQZUfQtinNump2ygkCTh6ox6DlEHxwE85rJMdAjBk cj9wBia7YVfb9fgXSVg18pbAViYC196NYW9D6jWI18BvnfTAn9m4XWsvWiwaGZEBGM NVyq3W/ZG6KUkux0S4tKghCh9c2/NGndA3PTc151uQ9mRgg9k7xn+nLrLuDs/1Kzb1 s9Ne6y55WTWOg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.savoirfairelinux.com Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id f6p0tkYRN10f; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com (mail.savoirfairelinux.com [192.168.48.237]) by mail.savoirfairelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F58C9C584C; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Elinor Montmasson To: Mark Brown Cc: Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , shengjiu wang , Xiubo Lee , Fabio Estevam , Nicolin Chen , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-sound , devicetree , linux-kernel , alsa-devel , linuxppc-dev Message-ID: <1220272166.706254.1717166894551.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> In-Reply-To: <291daed8-a2e1-44d4-9a71-5bca2c585720@sirena.org.uk> References: <20240515135411.343333-1-elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com> <20240515135411.343333-10-elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com> <599489232.349333.1715936741672.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> <500db9de-6113-4e73-ba92-6e52ea292b32@sirena.org.uk> <1598202415.701258.1717159684103.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> <291daed8-a2e1-44d4-9a71-5bca2c585720@sirena.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 9/9] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-asoc-card: add compatible for generic codec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4581 (ZimbraWebClient - GC112 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4581) Thread-Topic: ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-asoc-card: add compatible for generic codec Thread-Index: fUODjmUMbozLiD+24hweZL0h4n337g== Message-ID-Hash: 5JW3XLSUTEXECNBY6B7BJUO6OF5F4E4Z X-Message-ID-Hash: 5JW3XLSUTEXECNBY6B7BJUO6OF5F4E4Z X-MailFrom: elinor.montmasson@savoirfairelinux.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-alsa-devel.alsa-project.org-0; header-match-alsa-devel.alsa-project.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: "Mark Brown" Sent: Friday, 31 May, 2024 15:14:13 > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:48:04AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote: > >> Then maybe it's not be a good idea to make this compatible generic >> for this contribution. >> The original intention is to bring support for the S/PDIF, >> so maybe the contribution should focus on this use case? >> In that case, would changing the compatible for "fsl,imx-audio-spdif-card" >> be acceptable? >> "fsl,imx-audio-spdif" is already used for the `imx-spdif.c` >> which does not use the ASRC. > > Why not just use the existing compatible - why would someone not want to > be able to use the ASRC if it's available in their system? That's true but it will be a problem if both `fsl-asoc-card.c` and `imx-spdif.c` drivers have the same compatible, and they don't have the same DT properties.