From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Mardorf Subject: Re: [LAD] announcing envy24control, mudita (*) edition. Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:34:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1280140481.4930.28.camel@suse11-2> References: <1280139220.4930.20.camel@suse11-2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1280139220.4930.20.camel@suse11-2> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audio-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs/CEJeg2xFRV2D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org Errors-To: linux-audio-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs/CEJeg2xFRV2D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org To: Niels Mayer Cc: alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, linux-audio-announce-cunTk1MwBs/CEJeg2xFRV2D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, Jaroslav Kysela , Linux Audio Developers , PlanetCCRMA mailinglist , fedora-music-list List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 12:13 +0200, I wrote: > Suse 11.2 amd64 > TERRATEC EWX 24/96 > CPU usage when playing and moving the DAC faders for 0.6.0 it's around > 30%, but for 1.0.0 it's > 60%. Pardon. CPU usage when playing and moving the DAC faders for 0.6.0 it's > 20% < 25%, but for 1.0.0 it's > 30% < 50%. I did watch the complete CPU usage first, but the application's CPU usage. I did the same mistake when I watched the meters, but regarding to the faders the information seems to be important.