[PATCH] soc/imx/Kconfig: update to latest changes in Kconfig option names

[PATCH] soc/imx/Kconfig: update to latest changes in Kconfig option names

[Eric Bénard]

Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>
---
 sound/soc/imx/Kconfig |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig b/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig
index 52dac5e..687c76f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig
@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ config SND_SOC_PHYCORE_AC97
 
 config SND_SOC_EUKREA_TLV320
 	tristate "Eukrea TLV320"
-	depends on MACH_EUKREA_MBIMX27_BASEBOARD || MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD_BASEBOARD
+	depends on MACH_EUKREA_MBIMX27_BASEBOARD \
+		|| MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD25_BASEBOARD \
+		|| MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD35_BASEBOARD
 	select SND_SOC_TLV320AIC23
 	help
 	  Enable I2S based access to the TLV320AIC23B codec attached
-- 
1.6.3.3

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

Re: [PATCH] soc/imx/Kconfig: update to latest changes in Kconfig option names

[Eric Bénard]

Hi Mark, Hi Liam,

Le 30/07/2010 23:01, Eric Bénard a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard<eric@eukrea.com>
> ---
>   sound/soc/imx/Kconfig |    4 +++-
>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig b/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig
> index 52dac5e..687c76f 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig
> +++ b/sound/soc/imx/Kconfig
> @@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ config SND_SOC_PHYCORE_AC97
>
>   config SND_SOC_EUKREA_TLV320
>   	tristate "Eukrea TLV320"
> -	depends on MACH_EUKREA_MBIMX27_BASEBOARD || MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD_BASEBOARD
> +	depends on MACH_EUKREA_MBIMX27_BASEBOARD \
> +		|| MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD25_BASEBOARD \
> +		|| MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD35_BASEBOARD
>   	select SND_SOC_TLV320AIC23
>   	help
>   	  Enable I2S based access to the TLV320AIC23B codec attached

is it possible to get this patch merged for 2.6.36 as the Kconfig change 
is already merged in arch/arm/mach-mx25 and arch/arm/mach-mx3 ?

Thanks
Eric
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

Re: [PATCH] soc/imx/Kconfig: update to latest changes in Kconfig option names

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:19:09PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:

> is it possible to get this patch merged for 2.6.36 as the Kconfig
> change is already merged in arch/arm/mach-mx25 and arch/arm/mach-mx3
> ?

This change should have been made as part of the same patch that altered
the Kconfig symbols :/ .  Liam only just acked it yesterday, I've
applied it now.

Please also try to provide meanigful patch descriptions - an explanation
of what had changed and why might've been helpful, for example.

Re: [PATCH] soc/imx/Kconfig: update to latest changes in Kconfig option names

[Eric Bénard]

Le 05/08/2010 20:26, Mark Brown a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:19:09PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
>
>> is it possible to get this patch merged for 2.6.36 as the Kconfig
>> change is already merged in arch/arm/mach-mx25 and arch/arm/mach-mx3
>> ?
>
> This change should have been made as part of the same patch that altered
> the Kconfig symbols :/ .
OK I didn't know how to handle this as one part is in arm and the other 
in sound.

> Liam only just acked it yesterday, I've
> applied it now.
>
> Please also try to provide meanigful patch descriptions - an explanation
> of what had changed and why might've been helpful, for example.
>
OK, I'll try to improve this.

Thanks
Eric

Re: [PATCH] soc/imx/Kconfig: update to latest changes in Kconfig option names

[Mark Brown]

On 5 Aug 2010, at 20:12, Eric Bénard wrote:

> Le 05/08/2010 20:26, Mark Brown a écrit :
>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:19:09PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
>> 
>>> is it possible to get this patch merged for 2.6.36 as the Kconfig
>>> change is already merged in arch/arm/mach-mx25 and arch/arm/mach-mx3
>>> ?
>> 
>> This change should have been made as part of the same patch that altered
>> the Kconfig symbols :/ .
> OK I didn't know how to handle this as one part is in arm and the other in sound.

Send one patch to both places and let the maintainers figure out what the best way to merge it is.