From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: alsa-asoc-devel? Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:48:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1281091726.3077.6.camel@odin> References: <4C5BC9E9.2000407@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f179.google.com (mail-wy0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556AB10398F for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:48:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so7542656wyb.38 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:48:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C5BC9E9.2000407@canonical.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: David Henningsson Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:38 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > Hi, > > There is a lot of asoc traffic on this list, and I assume many people > following this list are not interested in ASoC patches. > > Have you considered splitting the alsa-devel mailing list into an > alsa-asoc-devel mailing list, for ASoC specific stuff, and alsa-devel > for everything else? > IMO, I think it's pretty much fine where it is atm. It's easy enough to filter the posts between ASoC, HDA, OSS etc if you are interested in a particular area. Moving the list would also mean core ALSA changes may not be fully discussed by ASoC developers/users etc. Liam -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk