From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dimitris Papastamos Subject: Re: ASoC updates for 2.6.37 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:58:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1285577933.4658.6.camel@dplaptop> References: <20100927002429.GB10992@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1285575674.4658.5.camel@dplaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA7210380A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:58:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 10:30 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Yeah, I do understand the initial intention, but size_t for such a > case (just for an index of a small fixed size array) is obviously too > much. If it must be size_t, it shouldn't be a variable name like "i" > but a more specific name. I see your point. Makes sense. Cheers, Dimitrios