From: Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@kpitcummins.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@ti.com>,
"kuninori.morimoto.gx" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] ASoC: da7210: Add support for line out and DAC
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:19:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319190555.24621.160.camel@matrix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111021090054.GF3513@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 10:00 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:07:40PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 18:10 +0100, Girdwood, Liam wrote:
>
> > > Any reason for not using DAPM here ? Otherwise they are always on
> > > making your chip burn mW.....
>
> > Not really. As explained in the comment in DAPM patch, this enables will
> > be effective (burn mW) only after respective IO is taken out from
> > STANDBY mode. DAPM takes care of managing STANDBY mode for all IOs and
> > ADC/DAC. I know this way of handling low power mode is bit non-trivial,
> > but it is what is recommended by chip designers. Actually Mark was also
> > initially confused with this and requested to put enough documentation
> > into code. After that I tried explaining the logic in source code
> > comment in DAPM patch. Let me know if it is not clear and doesn't convey
> > clearly what is should.
>
> That'd be fine but there's no DAPM code in the patch, only code to
> unconditionally enable on init.
>
Yes, because DAPM part for those IOs is already covered by DAPM patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-20 14:42 [PATCH v7 2/3] ASoC: da7210: Add support for line out and DAC Ashish Chavan
2011-10-20 17:10 ` [alsa-devel] " Girdwood, Liam
2011-10-21 8:37 ` Ashish Chavan
2011-10-21 9:00 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2011-10-21 9:49 ` Ashish Chavan [this message]
2011-10-21 10:24 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-21 11:05 ` Ashish Chavan
2011-10-21 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-21 11:32 ` Ashish Chavan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319190555.24621.160.camel@matrix \
--to=ashish.chavan@kpitcummins.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=david.chen@diasemi.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).