From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: core: Add support for masking out parts of coefficient blocks
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:49:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329526192-6747-2-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329526192-6747-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Chip designers frequently include things like the enable and disable
controls for algorithms in the register blocks which also hold the
coefficients. Since it's desirable to split out the enable/disable
control from userspace the plain SND_SOC_BYTES() isn't optimal for
these devices.
Add a SND_SOC_BYTES_MASK() which allows a bitmask from the first word
of the block to be excluded from the control. This supports the needs
of devices I've looked at and lets us have a reasonably simple API.
Further controls can be added in future if that's needed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
include/sound/soc.h | 9 ++++++
sound/soc/soc-core.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h
index 3e9cae0..82bd773 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc.h
@@ -192,6 +192,14 @@
((unsigned long)&(struct soc_bytes) \
{.base = xbase, .num_regs = xregs }) }
+#define SND_SOC_BYTES_MASK(xname, xbase, xregs, xmask) \
+{ .iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = xname, \
+ .info = snd_soc_bytes_info, .get = snd_soc_bytes_get, \
+ .put = snd_soc_bytes_put, .private_value = \
+ ((unsigned long)&(struct soc_bytes) \
+ {.base = xbase, .num_regs = xregs, \
+ .mask = xmask }) }
+
/*
* Simplified versions of above macros, declaring a struct and calculating
* ARRAY_SIZE internally
@@ -904,6 +912,7 @@ struct soc_mixer_control {
struct soc_bytes {
int base;
int num_regs;
+ u32 mask;
};
/* enumerated kcontrol */
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index ed9138e..bb01c02 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -2757,6 +2757,25 @@ int snd_soc_bytes_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
else
ret = -EINVAL;
+ /* Hide any masked bytes to ensure consistent data reporting */
+ if (ret == 0 && params->mask) {
+ switch (codec->val_bytes) {
+ case 1:
+ ucontrol->value.bytes.data[0] &= ~params->mask;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ ((u16 *)(&ucontrol->value.bytes.data))[0]
+ &= ~params->mask;
+ break;
+ case 4:
+ ((u32 *)(&ucontrol->value.bytes.data))[0]
+ &= ~params->mask;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_bytes_get);
@@ -2766,14 +2785,56 @@ int snd_soc_bytes_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
{
struct soc_bytes *params = (void *)kcontrol->private_value;
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
- int ret;
+ int ret, len;
+ unsigned int val;
+ void *data;
- if (codec->using_regmap)
- ret = regmap_raw_write(codec->control_data, params->base,
- ucontrol->value.bytes.data,
- params->num_regs * codec->val_bytes);
- else
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ if (!codec->using_regmap)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ len = params->num_regs * codec->val_bytes;
+
+ /*
+ * If we've got a mask then we need to preserve the register
+ * bits. We shouldn't modify the incoming data so take a
+ * copy.
+ */
+ if (params->mask) {
+ ret = regmap_read(codec->control_data, params->base, &val);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ val |= ~params->mask;
+
+ data = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ switch (codec->val_bytes) {
+ case 1:
+ ((u8 *)data)[0] &= ~params->mask;
+ ((u8 *)data)[0] |= val;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ ((u16 *)data)[0] &= ~params->mask;
+ ((u16 *)data)[0] |= val;
+ break;
+ case 4:
+ ((u32 *)data)[0] &= ~params->mask;
+ ((u32 *)data)[0] |= val;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ } else {
+ data = ucontrol->value.bytes.data;
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(codec->control_data, params->base,
+ data, len);
+
+ if (params->mask)
+ kfree(data);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-18 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-18 0:49 [PATCH 0/3] Coefficient configuration support Mark Brown
2012-02-18 0:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: core: Add SND_SOC_BYTES control for coefficient blocks Mark Brown
2012-02-18 0:49 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-02-18 0:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: wm5100: Add DRC coefficient configuration Mark Brown
2012-02-20 9:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] Coefficient configuration support Liam Girdwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329526192-6747-2-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).