From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tanu Kaskinen Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] Channel map API patches: to be 3.7 or not to be? Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:20:10 +0300 Message-ID: <1347470410.14342.3.camel@laptop> References: <504F2C65.1090204@ladisch.de> <5050B91A.7020303@ladisch.de> Reply-To: General PulseAudio Discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5050B91A.7020303@ladisch.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: pulseaudio-discuss-bounces+gcapd-polypaudio-discuss=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: pulseaudio-discuss-bounces+gcapd-polypaudio-discuss=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Clemens Ladisch Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 18:32 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote: > Takashi Iwai wrote: > >> Clemens Ladisch wrote: > >>> Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>>> is it useful to add SND_CHMAP_MONO, or is it just redundant? > >>> > >>> What would it be used for? > > > > Looking at PulseAudio and gstreamer codes, they seem to have explicit > > MONO channel definition. > > [...] > > So, defining MONO seems rather standard. Now I'm inclined to define > > SND_CHMAP_MONO... > > Okay; if they want it, they can get it ... Speaking as a PulseAudio developer, "wanting" is a bit strong word. I initially wanted it, but I don't anymore think that it's necessary. I don't think it will do any harm either, though... -- Tanu