From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hda_intel: ratelimit "spurious response" message Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:28:18 -0800 Message-ID: <1383856098.9263.28.camel@joe-AO722> References: <1383854115.9263.21.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel , LKML List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 21:23 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:55:15 -0800, > Joe Perches wrote: > > > > dmesg here has a 100+ consecutive lines of: > > > > [ 1464.219446] hda-intel 0000:00:14.2: spurious response 0x0:0x0, last cmd=0x170500 > > [ 1464.219451] hda-intel 0000:00:14.2: spurious response 0x0:0x0, last cmd=0x170500 > > [ 1464.219454] hda-intel 0000:00:14.2: spurious response 0x0:0x0, last cmd=0x170500 > > ... > > > > Ratelimit the message to reduce the dmesg log noise. > > > > Coalesce the format while at it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches > > Thanks, applied. > > BTW, which hardware shows this problem? > I'm interested rather in that... It's a little Acer netbook AO725 # lspci -v -v -s0:14.2 00:14.2 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH Azalia Controller (rev 01) Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device 0740 Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=slow >TAbort- SERR-