From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: Fix sparse warnings for firmware loader. Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:00:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1392807637-4767-1-git-send-email-liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA002652C5 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:00:56 +0100 (CET) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Sparse gives us the following warning on sst-firmware.c CHECK sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c:39:34: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c:39:34: expected void volatile [noderef] *dst sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c:39:34: got void * sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c:417:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c:417:36: expected void *dest sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c:417:36: got void [noderef] * sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c:430:5: warning: symbol 'sst_block_module_remove' was not declared. Should it be static? This patch removes this warning. Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c b/sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c index 31cd154..dee7eb5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/sst-firmware.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ #include "sst-dsp.h" #include "sst-dsp-priv.h" -static void sst_memcpy32(void *dest, void *src, u32 bytes) +static void sst_memcpy32(volatile void __iomem *dest, void *src, u32 bytes) { u32 i; -- 1.8.3.2