From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Subhransu S. Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: sst-haswell-pcm: Move controls and DAPM elements to component
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:08:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408532929-26978-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> (raw)
The sst-haswell-pcm driver is the only one that registers controls and DAPM
elements for a snd_soc_platform_driver. Moving them over to the component that
is registered by the same driver make it possible to remove the
steal_silbling_dai_hack in the core as well as the extra indirection that is
used to register the controls and DAPM elements.
Vinod, Subhransu, can you take a look at this and make sure it works as expected
and also keep this in mind for the new DPCM drivers?
Thanks,
- Lars
Lars-Peter Clausen (4):
ASoC: Add snd_soc_component_{get,set}_drvdata()
ASoC: sst-haswell-pcm: Alloc state struct in driver probe()
ASoC: sst-haswell-pcm: Move controls and DAPM elements to component
ASoC: Remove table based DAPM/control setup support from
snd_soc_platform_driver
include/sound/soc.h | 28 ++++++++++---------
sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
sound/soc/soc-core.c | 58 ++++-----------------------------------
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
--
1.8.0
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-20 11:08 Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2014-08-20 11:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: Add snd_soc_component_{get, set}_drvdata() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-09-03 12:22 ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-03 19:06 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-09-04 6:33 ` Vinod Koul
2014-08-20 11:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: sst-haswell-pcm: Alloc state struct in driver probe() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-08-20 11:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: sst-haswell-pcm: Move controls and DAPM elements to component Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-08-20 11:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: Remove table based DAPM/control setup support from snd_soc_platform_driver Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-09-06 13:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: sst-haswell-pcm: Move controls and DAPM elements to component Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1408532929-26978-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).