Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Wilbur Wang <wwang27@marvell.com>,
	Qiao Zhou <zhouqiao@marvell.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Chao Xie <cxie4@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [Question about DPCM] dpcm_run_new_update races again xrun
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:20:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415035212.2471.26.camel@loki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5h1tpkb4y5.wl-tiwai@suse.de>

On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 17:54 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:42:16 +0100,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > 
> > At Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:32:04 +0000,
> > Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 03:28 -0800, Qiao Zhou wrote:
> > > > Hi Mark, Liam
> > > > 
> > > > I met one BE not-function issue when developing DPCM feature, and found
> > > > dpcm_run_new_update is not protected well against xrun(interrupt context).
> > > > Could you help to give some suggestions?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I'm wondering if this would be better solved by improving the locking so
> > > that an XRUN could not run at the same time as the runtime update. Both
> > > functions are async, but are only protected by a mutex atm (like the
> > > rest of PCM ops except trigger which is atomic). We maybe need to add a
> > > spinlock to both runtime_update() and dpcm_fe_dai_trigger() 
> > 
> > Be careful, you cannot take spinlock while hw_params, for example.
> > 
> > Why do you need to set runtime_update to NO in the trigger callback in
> > the first place?  The trigger may influence on the FE streaming state,
> > but not on the FE/BE connection state, right?
> 
> Thinking of this again, this doesn't look like a good suggestion,
> either.
> 
> As mentioned, we can't take a lock for the whole lengthy operation
> like prepare or hw_params.  So, instead of taking a lock, the trigger
> should be delayed when some operation is being performed.  (I thought
> at first just performing FE's trigger and delaying BE later, but FE/BE
> trigger can be more complex than that, so it ends up with the whole
> delayed trigger.)
> 
> The patch below is a quick hack (only compile tested!).  It uses PCM's
> stream lock for protecting against the race for the state transition,
> and the trigger callback checks the state, aborts immediately if there
> is a concurrent operation.  At the exit of state change, it invokes
> the delayed trigger.
> 
> Let me know if this really works as imagined.  Then I'll cook up a
> proper patch.
> 

I'll give the patch a try tomorrow and it would be good for Marvell to
test tomorrow too (as my system does not XRUN).

Thanks

Liam

> 
> Takashi
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
> index 2883a7a6f9f3..98f2ade0266e 100644
> --- a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
> +++ b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ struct snd_soc_dpcm_runtime {
>  	/* state and update */
>  	enum snd_soc_dpcm_update runtime_update;
>  	enum snd_soc_dpcm_state state;
> +
> +	int trigger_pending; /* trigger cmd + 1 if pending, 0 if not */
>  };
>  
>  /* can this BE stop and free */
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> index 002311afdeaa..fbd570c55a67 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> @@ -1522,13 +1522,36 @@ static void dpcm_set_fe_runtime(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  		dpcm_init_runtime_hw(runtime, &cpu_dai_drv->capture);
>  }
>  
> +static int dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd);
> +
> +/* Set FE's runtime_update state; the state is protected via PCM stream lock
> + * for avoiding the race with trigger callback.
> + * If the state is unset and a trigger is pending while the previous operation,
> + * process the pending trigger action here.
> + */
> +static void dpcm_set_fe_update_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
> +				     int stream, enum snd_soc_dpcm_update state)
> +{
> +	struct snd_pcm_substream *substream =
> +		snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(fe, stream);
> +
> +	snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(substream);
> +	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = state;
> +	if (state == SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO && fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending) {
> +		dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(substream,
> +				       fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending - 1);
> +		fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending = 0;
> +	}
> +	snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream);
> +}
> +
>  static int dpcm_fe_dai_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream)
>  {
>  	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data;
>  	struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = fe_substream->runtime;
>  	int stream = fe_substream->stream, ret = 0;
>  
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE);
>  
>  	ret = dpcm_be_dai_startup(fe, fe_substream->stream);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -1550,13 +1573,13 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream)
>  	dpcm_set_fe_runtime(fe_substream);
>  	snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(runtime);
>  
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  	return 0;
>  
>  unwind:
>  	dpcm_be_dai_startup_unwind(fe, fe_substream->stream);
>  be_err:
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1603,7 +1626,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = substream->private_data;
>  	int stream = substream->stream;
>  
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE);
>  
>  	/* shutdown the BEs */
>  	dpcm_be_dai_shutdown(fe, substream->stream);
> @@ -1617,7 +1640,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  	dpcm_dapm_stream_event(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_STOP);
>  
>  	fe->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_CLOSE;
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1665,7 +1688,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  	int err, stream = substream->stream;
>  
>  	mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME);
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE);
>  
>  	dev_dbg(fe->dev, "ASoC: hw_free FE %s\n", fe->dai_link->name);
>  
> @@ -1680,7 +1703,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  	err = dpcm_be_dai_hw_free(fe, stream);
>  
>  	fe->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_HW_FREE;
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1773,7 +1796,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>  	int ret, stream = substream->stream;
>  
>  	mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME);
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE);
>  
>  	memcpy(&fe->dpcm[substream->stream].hw_params, params,
>  			sizeof(struct snd_pcm_hw_params));
> @@ -1796,7 +1819,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>  		fe->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_HW_PARAMS;
>  
>  out:
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  	mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1910,14 +1933,12 @@ int dpcm_be_dai_trigger(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpcm_be_dai_trigger);
>  
> -static int dpcm_fe_dai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
> +static int dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
>  {
>  	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = substream->private_data;
>  	int stream = substream->stream, ret;
>  	enum snd_soc_dpcm_trigger trigger = fe->dai_link->trigger[stream];
>  
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE;
> -
>  	switch (trigger) {
>  	case SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_PRE:
>  		/* call trigger on the frontend before the backend. */
> @@ -1928,7 +1949,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
>  		ret = soc_pcm_trigger(substream, cmd);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
>  			dev_err(fe->dev,"ASoC: trigger FE failed %d\n", ret);
> -			goto out;
> +			return ret;
>  		}
>  
>  		ret = dpcm_be_dai_trigger(fe, substream->stream, cmd);
> @@ -1939,7 +1960,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
>  		ret = dpcm_be_dai_trigger(fe, substream->stream, cmd);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
>  			dev_err(fe->dev,"ASoC: trigger FE failed %d\n", ret);
> -			goto out;
> +			return ret;
>  		}
>  
>  		dev_dbg(fe->dev, "ASoC: post trigger FE %s cmd %d\n",
> @@ -1956,14 +1977,13 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
>  		ret = soc_pcm_bespoke_trigger(substream, cmd);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
>  			dev_err(fe->dev,"ASoC: trigger FE failed %d\n", ret);
> -			goto out;
> +			return ret;
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		dev_err(fe->dev, "ASoC: invalid trigger cmd %d for %s\n", cmd,
>  				fe->dai_link->name);
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	switch (cmd) {
> @@ -1979,7 +1999,25 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -out:
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dpcm_fe_dai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = substream->private_data;
> +	int stream = substream->stream, ret;
> +
> +	/* if FE's runtime_update is already set, we're in race;
> +	 * process this trigger later at exit
> +	 */
> +	if (fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update != SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO) {
> +		fe->dpcm[stream].trigger_pending = cmd + 1;
> +		return 0; /* delayed, assuming it's successful */
> +	}
> +
> +	/* we're alone, let's trigger */
> +	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE;
> +	ret = dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger(substream, cmd);
>  	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2027,7 +2065,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  
>  	dev_dbg(fe->dev, "ASoC: prepare FE %s\n", fe->dai_link->name);
>  
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE);
>  
>  	/* there is no point preparing this FE if there are no BEs */
>  	if (list_empty(&fe->dpcm[stream].be_clients)) {
> @@ -2054,7 +2092,7 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  	fe->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_PREPARE;
>  
>  out:
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  	mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex);
>  
>  	return ret;
> @@ -2201,11 +2239,11 @@ static int dpcm_run_new_update(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE);
>  	ret = dpcm_run_update_startup(fe, stream);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		dev_err(fe->dev, "ASoC: failed to startup some BEs\n");
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2214,11 +2252,11 @@ static int dpcm_run_old_update(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_BE);
>  	ret = dpcm_run_update_shutdown(fe, stream);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		dev_err(fe->dev, "ASoC: failed to shutdown some BEs\n");
> -	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO;
> +	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-03 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-03 11:28 [Question about DPCM] dpcm_run_new_update races again xrun Qiao Zhou
2014-11-03 13:32 ` Liam Girdwood
2014-11-03 14:42   ` Takashi Iwai
2014-11-03 16:54     ` Takashi Iwai
2014-11-03 17:20       ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2014-11-03 18:45         ` Takashi Iwai
2014-11-04  6:43         ` Qiao Zhou
2014-11-03 17:16     ` Liam Girdwood
2014-11-03 17:19       ` Liam Girdwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1415035212.2471.26.camel@loki \
    --to=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cxie4@marvell.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=wwang27@marvell.com \
    --cc=zhouqiao@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox