From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] ASoC DSP topology
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:03:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429610628.3793.23.camel@loki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150421092812.GA22845@sirena.org.uk>
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 10:28 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:58:27AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> > It is not entirely clear for me based on the first look, but who is
> > responsible to initiate the topology load? Is it the component or machine
> > driver? We have had issues with deferred probing when the component driver was
> > in charge of loading the firmware. I got around this by initiating the FW load
> > from the machine driver and via callbacks I notified the component driver to
> > take over from that point. This fixed the probe order and I can also handle
> > cases when the filesystem does not have the firmware so I can fall back to
> > 'legacy' mode.
>
> Could you expand on those issues please? I'd *really* not expect the
> machine driver to be involved in loading firmware for a component driver
> (think how this is going to affect generic drivers) and it's not obvious
> to me what impact this might have on deferred probe either.
The OMAP4 driver should not have any issues using the new topology code,
it's very generic :)
The topology code has moved to the component model so the ABE DSP driver
can load it's FW topology. If the FS is not available to load FW or
topology then you can wait until FS is ready (the upstream SST drivers
wait for FW to be ready before continuing with probing).
Liam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-16 20:48 [RFC 0/4] ASoC DSP topology Liam Girdwood
2015-04-20 21:40 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-21 6:58 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-21 9:28 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-21 10:03 ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2015-04-21 12:30 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-21 15:23 ` Liam Girdwood
2015-04-21 16:39 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-22 4:10 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429610628.3793.23.camel@loki \
--to=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox