From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: Splitting out controls Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1444846832.2606.53.camel@loki> References: <1444657786.2528.78.camel@loki> <20151012205908.GA25971@us.netrek.org> <561CADA8.3040903@canonical.com> <561D1B7D.9080307@linux.intel.com> <561D2997.1090401@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACF626153A for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:20:35 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <561D2997.1090401@canonical.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: David Henningsson Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart , James Cameron List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 17:56 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > > On 2015-10-13 16:55, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > On 10/13/15 2:07 AM, David Henningsson wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2015-10-12 22:59, James Cameron wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:49:46PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: > >>>> I've written up the minutes here below > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>>> Splitting out controls: Takashi > >>>> =============================== > >>>> > >>>> - Restricted access. Consensus to restrict access to some controls > > Note: There is NOT consensus. Sorry, this should be "control values" instead of "controls". I guess my typing speed was not fast enough to keep up :( My understanding at the time was we could use the existing clamp API to clamp kcontrol values (in machine drivers) to reasonable/safe values. I did hear many objections to setting some kcontrols as RO for certain users and RW for other users. Liam