From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: topology: Reenable use from userspace Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:47:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1446461251.2623.26.camel@loki> References: <1445830900-1752-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> <20151031025448.GA28319@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3652607C8 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:47:35 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20151031025448.GA28319@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown , Mendong Lin Cc: Takashi Iwai , Vinod Koul , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 11:54 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:41:40PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > We had inserted a #error into the topology UAPI code to ensure that the > > ABI was not adopted by userspace while final review and testing was > > ongoing. Since we are now comfortable that the ABI is suitable for > > production remove the #error, future changes will include provision for > > backwards compatibility. > > > Are we OK with this? Looking for some acks and reviews... > > I saw a reply from Vinod but nobody else here. Mengdong are we good here ? Liam